tpo 46
The reading passage claims that there are many efforts to convince vast majorities of doctors in the United States to save and store medical information electronically on the systems than save them traditionally on papers. In fact, this method could bring many advantages, especially for doctors. However, the lecturer finds all the advantages dubious and presents some evidence to refute them all.
First, the author contends that save information on papers need a vast sum of money in terms of transferring records, storage place and so forth. So, use electronic version could diminish these cost dramatically and provide an opportunity for doctors to access information on computer databases. Conversely, the lecturer underlines this idea due to the fact that many doctors keep information as emergency and most of the time they need that information with signature for legal action. Also, in electronic format, some money should be paid for storage cost.
Furthermore, the author holds the view that use papers for storing data might create some problems and increase errors. For instance, handwriting, improper transcription and so on, provide fertile ground for more mistakes. On the contrary, the professor brings up the idea that myriads of doctors use pen and paper when they visit patients. So, poor handwriting and some mistakes made by doctors could cause mistakes when introducing information on computers.
Finally, as set forth by the author electronic format can provide an opportunity for more researchers and data provided on computers allow people to have access to that information easily and quickly. In contrast, the speaker dismisses this issue owing to the fact that use data on computers still have some trials and tribulations thanks to privacy law in the United States. In fact, access to those information needs permission that is not granted.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-30 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2021-09-27 | afgmar | 70 | view |
| 2021-08-12 | yasamiamirreza | 70 | view |
| 2021-04-22 | mahi22 | 80 | view |
| 2020-11-14 | Masoome shahsavari | 70 | view |
- "Traffic here in Waymarsh is becoming a problem. Although just three years ago a state traffic survey showed that the typical driving commuter took 20 minutes to get to work, the commute now takes closer to 40 minutes, according to the survey just complet 59
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television has destroyed communication among friends and family. 8
- people should stay with their old friends than making new friends. do you agree or disagree? 73
- In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at the young age. 66
- Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study. Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.Writ 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 396, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'those informations'?
Suggestion: this information; those informations
...n the United States. In fact, access to those information needs permission that is not granted. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, so, still, for instance, in contrast, in fact, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1587.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 296.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36148648649 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82351396302 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567567567568 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3010872723 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.357142857 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06452816374 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24097042971 0.272083759551 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0817550928518 0.0996497079465 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491742857424 0.0662205650399 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144991944676 0.162205337803 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243993052076 0.0443174109184 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.3589403974 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.8541721854 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.