The reading and lecture both discuss the idea of replacement the internal combustion engine by hydrogen based full cell engine. While the reading states three advatages of using the hydrgogen based full cell engine over the internal combustion engine, the professor refutes, saying none of these claims are convencing.
Firstly, the reading states that the internal combustion engine depends on oil which is a limited resoiurce. While the hydrogen cell engine is infinite resource. On the other hand, the professor argues this notion by saying that hydrogen cannot be the solution for that because because hydrogen is not that easy to find. In addition, he states that hydrogen should be in a pure liquid form to be used, and this is a very artificial proccess. Moreover, it is very hard to produce and storage the hydrogen. This is because this proccess needs like cold 253 celicieus degrees. So, this is not practicle.
In addition, the article claims that the hydrgen will end the pollution problem because the by-product will be just water, but the innernal combustion engine's by- product will be carbon dioxide which is very risky. nevertheless, the speaker questions this ides by pointing out that hydrgoen will not solve the problem, and the hydrogen will creates more pollution. Besides, he avers that the hydrogen purification proccess needs burn oil and coil and that will creates more pollution. So, the hydrogen factory will cause risk for the enviroment.
Finally, the reading shows that the using of hydrogen will save money on the long run because the hydrogen cell needs just the half power that required for the internal cell to do the same distance. However, the professor rejects this idea demonstrates that using of hydrogen is not cost saving. Furthermore, the manifacture itself is very expensive because this is require platinum which is very costly. Also, he explains that the manifacture with other metal rather than the platnium was unsuccessful.
- tpo integrated writing 27 76
- TPO-25 - Integrated Writing Task 73
- TPO-27 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying.Use specific reasons and ex 70
- TPO-31- Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the pastUse specific reasons and examples to 70
- TPO 29-Integrated writing 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ds on oil which is a limited resoiurce. While the hydrogen cell engine is infinite re...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: because
...ydrogen cannot be the solution for that because because hydrogen is not that easy to find. In a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 216, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Nevertheless
... be carbon dioxide which is very risky. nevertheless, the speaker questions this ides by poi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 342, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'create'
Suggestion: create
...olve the problem, and the hydrogen will creates more pollution. Besides, he avers that ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 367, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'required'.
Suggestion: required
...tself is very expensive because this is require platinum which is very costly. Also, he...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.01324503311 279% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1663.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 321.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18068535826 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56987632426 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489096573209 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 511.2 419.366225166 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.1230245533 49.2860985944 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8235294118 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8823529412 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367414069964 0.272083759551 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120811961846 0.0996497079465 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0892073101812 0.0662205650399 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232234551278 0.162205337803 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0239471321894 0.0443174109184 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.