Law can change human behavior. Do you agree or not?
Recently, individuals’ behavior and law have sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “is it advantageous or not?” whereas it is a widely held view that human behavior governed by legislation is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the sociology standpoint, the rule of law and developments are bound up inextricably with governments policies, which indicates they lead to both progress lifestyle and state-of-the-art technologies. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between globalization and crime commitment crisis as well as an exponential increase in social achievements. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far support the contention that the likelihood of occurring strict law is correlated positively with not only irreversible changes.
Within the realm of juridical science, without the slightest doubt, efficient legislative systems attribute to alternative hypotheses, in that it would come down governmental interventions, criminal behaviors, and international legal institutions. A salient example of such attribution is non-governmental organizations, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take X achievements for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint X problems. Likewise, hardly had they confine their attention to punishment, jail, and even jury. Hence, it is reasonable that infer the pivotal role of systematic changes.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well” after analyzing what elaborated above, I highly agree that severe legislation effects on behavior are of high importance. However, we perceive that with the benefit of hindsight, the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-01-20 | Mahdi_Farhani | 88 | view |
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction To what extent do you agree or disagree What sort of punishments should parents and teachers be allowe 67
- What is the most significant invention and its corresponding to last 100 years; the computer, antibiotics, the airplane, and explainwhy? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your ownknowledge or experience. 11
- Some people think that it is better for children to learn a foreign language at primary school. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 88
- People pursue dangerous activities like skydiving, motorcycle sports, whitewater river rafting etc. Do you support? If yes, why and if not, why? 11
- Vegetarianism is more ethical than eating meat.” Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with this statement. Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observations. 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1698.0 1207.87684729 141% => OK
No of words: 284.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.97887323944 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.58268029492 2.71678728327 132% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 139.433497537 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.700704225352 0.580463131201 121% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.0899706088 50.4703680194 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.5 104.977214359 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.25397266985 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.092652477444 0.242375264174 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0228083885403 0.0925447433944 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378583704115 0.071462118173 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0554761093376 0.151781067708 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450210806829 0.0609392437508 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 12.6369458128 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 53.1260098522 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.7 11.5310837438 153% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.39 8.32886699507 137% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 55.0591133005 216% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 22.5 9.94827586207 226% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.