The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn and relearn. Agree or disagree?
Recently the phenomenon of contemporary illiteracy and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that dumping obsolete skills is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded both positive and constructive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that acquiring new skills can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a technological standpoint, modern inventions can provide the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that computers’ operating systems, as well as our way of doing things, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the necessity of upgrading skills. Thus beneficial ramifications of both unlearning and relearning, apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of future generations, staying in touch with friends might increase the consequences of literacy. Moreover fundamental aspects of not continuously keep learning relate to this reality that the demerits of disconnection from friends pertain to social networking illiteracy. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of present-day illiterateness is correlated negatively with the process of unlearning. Hence it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of constant expansion of skills.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of developing up-to-date skill sets far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the rapidly changing world prove the significance of embracing reforms, but also pinpoint adaptions implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 384, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ered the necessity of upgrading skills. Thus beneficial ramifications of both unlear...
^^^^
Line 5, column 116, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
... increase the consequences of literacy. Moreover fundamental aspects of not continuously...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 179, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to relate'
Suggestion: to relate
...pects of not continuously keep learning relate to this reality that the demerits of di...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 249, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e demerits of disconnection from friends pertain to social networking illiteracy....
^^^
Line 5, column 495, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...atively with the process of unlearning. Hence it is correct to presume the preconceiv...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1517.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 261.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.8122605364 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40201838615 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 139.433497537 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.689655172414 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.730868833 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.416666667 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0438304297794 0.242375264174 18% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.015017993813 0.0925447433944 16% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0241190322107 0.071462118173 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0221790784991 0.151781067708 15% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0129356807281 0.0609392437508 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.27 8.32886699507 135% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.