Some people think studying from the past offers no benefits to today’s life, while others believe history is a valuable source of information for us. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
People hold divergent views as to whether learning from history is beneficial to our lives. Both sides of the argument will be discussed in this essay, followed by my own perspective on this matter that learning history is of paramount importance in our life.
People supporting the idea that studying history is useless may put forth the following reasons. First of all, learning history wastes our precious study time. As history is regarded as a subject that cannot provide any direct benefits to our daily life, putting too much focus on it distracts our attentions from other useful subjects like genetic engineering and artificial intelligence. Moreover, in terms of its educational meaning, learning history is incapable of preventing humans from making similar mistakes. The outbreaks of the Second World War plays a vivid example here. Even though people had learnt lessons from the World War One, the World War 2 still inevitably broke out in the 1940s.
However, those who believe valuable information can be collected from history also possesses some sound points. To begin with, history contains and reflects traditional cultures and values. Learning it enables people to build a connection with previous generations and have a deep understanding of current moral and cultural system, thereby enhancing people’s national identities. Additionally, the discovery of some new breakthroughs is largely attributed to the abstraction of valuable information from historic records. For example, through looking back to the ancient medical record in Vietnam, scientists have found that sweet wormwood containing artemisinin is the specific medicine to cure malaria.
From my point of view, history plays an essential role to instruct our present practices. Although learning history associates with certain weaknesses, the strengths of it are more than capable of counteracting those drawbacks. Therefore, I firmly support the idea that the value of history ought to be taken seriously.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-11 | shiny jaya ratna | 56 | view |
- International travel has many advantages to travellers and the country being visited. Do you think the advantages outweigh disadvantages? 76
- Some people say that we do not need printed newspaper any more. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 71
- Over the past century, reading, writing, and maths skills are always the most important parts of education. Some people argue that every child will benefit if a fourth skill is added: the computer skills. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 66
- International travel has many advantages to travellers and the country being visited. Do you think the advantages outweigh disadvantages? 59
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 78
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Learning it enables people to build a connection with previous generations and have a deep understanding of current moral and cultural system
Learning it enables people to build a connection with previous generations and has a deep understanding of current moral and cultural system
Learning it enables people to build a connection with previous generations and to have a deep understanding of current moral and cultural system
--------------------
flaws:
Same structure duplicated:
Even though people had learnt lessons from the World War One, the World War 2 still inevitably broke out in the 1940s.
Although learning history associates with certain weaknesses, the strengths of it are more than capable of counteracting those drawbacks.
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 307 350
No. of Characters: 1651 1500
No. of Different Words: 204 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.186 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.378 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.798 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 134 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 115 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 75 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 45 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.188 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.011 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.625 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.334 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.523 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.064 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Hi teacher,
Hi teacher,
Could you please help me to see whether the following sentence is better than the previous one?
Despite associating with certain weaknesses, the strengths of learning history are more than capable of counteracting its drawbacks.
Thanks.
Vickie
Yes, it doesn't duplicate the
Yes, it doesn't duplicate the previous sentence. But it could be removed, and we can make the conclusion even simpler:
From my point of view, history plays an essential role to instruct our present practices. The value of history ought to be taken seriously.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 29, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
People hold divergent views as to whether learning from history is beneficial to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, moreover, second, so, still, therefore, as to, for example, first of all, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1695.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52117263844 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89036514212 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654723127036 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2160923309 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.9375 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1875 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0625 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242229552763 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072183862072 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447742583506 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136109423803 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034893875966 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.