People supporting the idea that history is useless in terms of following reasons. First of all, knowing history is waste of time and it doesn’t have a much impact on our daily life. There’s nothing to do with history to lead our daily lives. As history is regarded just as a subject that cannot provide any direct benefits for bright future. We can observe many changes happened from past to present. When compared to history, todays life is far luxurious, well developed, better communications and best transportation. There is burgeoning in technology which is useful for future generations. There’s humongous change in present life like constructing unique architectural buildings, discovering new medicines for deadly diseases, introducing new electronic devices and so on. Nowadays even a cancer can be cured by medicines discovered with the help of technology.
The most effective method of studying is derived from history. There is ample evidence from numerous studies that are developed based on history studies. For example, ayurvedic is an old therapy to cure health illness where most of the people still follow. There are many useful sources of information can be learned from history. In many villages in India, people follow old traditions and rituals for curing the diseases. History plays an essential role to instruct our present practices. History explains the culture, traditions and rituals followed by ancient people.
Hence I firmly support that history has a valuable source of information for future generations.
- During a recent plane journey, you sat next to a businessman who owns a chain of restaurants. You talked to him and he suggested that you should contact him about a possible job in one of his restaurants.Write a letter to this businessman. In your letterr 73
- Some people think studying from the past offers no benefits to today’s life, while others believe history is a valuable source of information for us. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 56
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Is it a positive or negative development? 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: A_MUCH_NN1[1]
Message: Maybe you should omit the article "a", leaving only 'much'.
Suggestion: much
... waste of time and it doesn't have a much impact on our daily life. There's ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...rituals followed by ancient people. Hence I firmly support that history has a val...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, so, still, well, for example, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1319.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 242.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45041322314 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92785143913 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.644628099174 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.3769205365 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.5882352941 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.2352941176 20.7667163134 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.52941176471 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229935807733 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707464884618 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385638799855 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16581914694 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0133746817819 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.