Legacy, it is what we leave behind when we are no longer alive. It is what people remember us for, the impact that we create, that is what legacy means. And most often people who have lasting legacy are those who don't accept temporary failure and persist their efforts for the idea they believe in, regardless of what people say. I agree that it necessary to overcome the doubts and criticism what working the idea we believe in.
There will always be some people or we can say, naysayers and haters, who will provide as unsolicited advice and doubts, which indeed stops us from doing what is required for our idea to manifest. The only way to overcome this negative force is to not regard this person and their criticism. For example, when bitcoin came into existence many people doubted that it is a bubble, it is a fake currency. Although it is not legit currency, some people who didn't fall into the trap of other people's opinions, made millions of dollars and few even made billions.
Many people take criticism too seriously without making sure about the critics' validity and stop taking actions or they retreat from the idea they initially believed in. which eventually causes failure. For example, Walt Disney was told that he lacked imagination and was also not given the job due to that reason. he would never have made the Disney empire if he had taken that criticism seriously, rather he persisted and kept doing what he believed in, and still, his legacy perpetuate.
Sometimes, doubts and criticism can prevent us from failing on large scale, here large scale means failing so large that chances of recovering from that are very low or zero. For example, many callow entrepreneurs come up with some business idea to solve any specific problem. On their idea, they might get some criticism from their senior investors or business advisers like, need to make a more pragmatic plan to implement the idea or doubt about is this product really will have significant demand in the market. novice entrepreneurs who go ahead without taking meticulous consideration about above recommendations or doubts and invest all their money and invest in the idea, and then go bankrupt.
In sum, in order to leave a long-lasting beneficiary legacy, one must not let doubts and criticism stopping them, from taking action towards the idea they believe in. And those who are affected by doubts of failure and the negative criticism have very less chance of leaving a lasting legacy.
- Money spent on research is almost always a good investment even when the results of that research are controversial 55
- Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy. 62
- Children over the age of 15 should be allowed to vote. 60
- When schools do not have enough funding or teachers, some people think physical education classes should be cut, while others believe that courses in art and music should be eliminated first. Which do you think is preferable, and why? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Legacy, it is what we leave behind when ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 219, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e who have lasting legacy are those who dont accept temporary failure and persist th...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...what working the idea we believe in. There will always be some people or we c...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 463, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... is not legit currency, some people who didnt fall into the trap of other peoples opi...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... dollars and few even made billions. Many people take criticism too seriously...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 80, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'critics'' or 'critic's'?
Suggestion: critics'; critic's
...seriously without making sure about the critics validity and stop taking actions or the...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 324, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...o not given the job due to that reason. he would never have made the Disney empire...
^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n, and still, his legacy perpetuate. Sometimes, doubts and criticism can prev...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 522, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Novice
... have significant demand in the market. novice entrepreneurs who go ahead without taki...
^^^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in the idea, and then go bankrupt. In sum, in order to leave a long-lasting...
^^^^^^
Line 10, column 300, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ess chance of leaving a lasting legacy.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, really, so, still, then, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2068.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 424.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87735849057 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42907583216 2.79657885939 87% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537735849057 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 657.9 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3300864774 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.888888889 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.94444444444 5.21951772744 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.13820224719 253% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273608914484 0.243740707755 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0868277766269 0.0831039109588 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0862028074071 0.0758088955206 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169378631575 0.150359130593 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101518016101 0.0667264976115 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.