Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or is it the responsibility of producers to not over-package products in the first place?
Over-packaged products usage has increased dramatically over the past years and causing lot of problems. While some people think it is the responsibility of the consumers to avoid using over-packaged products, others think that the producers should desist from producing over-packaged products in the first place. This essay will discuss why producers should avoid manufacturing these types of products.
Producers should avoid from manufacturing over-packaged products because these materials used to package products can cause serious environmental problems. People throw away these package materials to the environment once they consume the products and this affects to the environment largely. For instance, some of these materials may take up to several years to completely decay. In short, manufacturers can take the responsibility and stop making over-packaged products as it saves the environment.
Manufacturers should also avoid from producing over-packaged products as it is not cost effective to use more materials to wrap goods than need. People tend to look for low price products and these over packaged products can be avoided by consumers due to over pricing. For example, price can get high if producers use more and more wrapping materials for the products. In sum, it is not cost effective to manufacture over-packaged products.
This essay discussed why producers avoid from producing over-packaged products because it is dangerous to the environment to dispose the wrapping materials and it is not cost effective to use more materials to wrap products. In my opinion, it is the responsibility of the producers to refrain from making over-packaged products.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-02-24 | halbouni1984 | 72 | view |
2018-02-24 | halbouni1984 | 72 | view |
2018-01-27 | Madhawa Vishwajith | 55 | view |
- People should stop giving to charities because they don’t know where their money ends up. 55
- People should pursue meaning, not happiness. 60
- Cheap overseas travel does more damage than good. 70
- People should pursue meaning, not happiness. 60
- Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or is it the responsibility of producers to not over-package products in the first place? 55
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, may, so, while, for example, for instance, in short, in my opinion, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 5.94088669951 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 255.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61960784314 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2445476697 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 139.433497537 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.43137254902 0.580463131201 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 450.0 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0759162189 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.230769231 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6153846154 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.25397266985 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 6.9802955665 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 2.75862068966 362% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.547731734014 0.242375264174 226% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.255303384249 0.0925447433944 276% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.16751992125 0.071462118173 234% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.412784035793 0.151781067708 272% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117335045508 0.0609392437508 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 12.6369458128 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 53.1260098522 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.32886699507 92% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 55.0591133005 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.