Should we preserve past historical buildings? How much care should be taken by their owners in terms of maintenance?
There is a difference of opinion among people about preserving Historical building. While some people believe that historical building should be protected, others stand against this notion stating that it is of waste of money. In my opinion, I would say that ancient building are to be protected as it represents the culture of a country and also could bring economic benefits to the country.
One of the predominant reasons for people to support this phenomenon is that the rich cultural heritage behind each one of these monuments. They believe that their culture is shown to the world through these buildings. For example, Students in countries like London or India often visits these kinds of buildings as part of their educational excursion to acquire knowledge about their roots.
Another potential reason to conserve the historical buildings is that it could bring economic benefits to a country. It is undeniable that these buildings are marvellous pieces of complex engineering which could attract many tourists if it is maintained properly. Furthermore, this could improve nation’s economic status.
On the other hand, some people are of the opinion that spending money on these buildings is of no use. This is because they think that investing on other things such as international business or inventions would ultimately benefit them. Although this is a fact, it stands short in front of the enormous benefits that these building would bring to the country and people. For these reasons, governments should invest substantial amount of money to protect these buildings.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that historical buildings encompassed the world in historical times. Moreover, these buildings represent the rich culture of a community for future generation and also uplift the current economic status of the country. Therefore, governments should take effective measures to protect these buildings.
- Whether English will remain to be the global language despite globalization 76
- Artificially intelligent robots are increasingly taking human jobs. Some people believe that eventually all work will be done by robots, while others believe that there is a limit to the tasks that robots can perform.Choose which poition you most agree wi 80
- Should we preserve past historical buildings? How much care should be taken by their owners in terms of maintenance? 77
- Some people believe laws change human behavior. Do you agree with it? 55
- Education system that assess the student's learning by written exam is correct? Discuss your view? 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 41.0 20.9802955665 195% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1207.87684729 136% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45666666667 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82358912655 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513333333333 0.580463131201 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 497.7 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1062080251 50.4703680194 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.3125 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 20.9669160288 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.25397266985 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 6.9802955665 201% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157177638575 0.242375264174 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588191397655 0.0925447433944 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456335159111 0.071462118173 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0986453664904 0.151781067708 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495832700013 0.0609392437508 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.