The chart below shows the male and female internet users aged 15-24 in Canada in 2000.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar graph depicts, the two categories were internet users under 24 years and over 15 years in Canada in 2000.
According to the graph , lots of females were used in internet and secondly most internet users were in male. Five differet useful networks obtain in this graph. Namely, email, social networks, online shopping and other activities. Most of female were sent emails. females were jigher than malesin mail category. On the other hand male high proportion was used in soacial network. Social network users were female and male was shown approximately same percentag.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-21 | dhruv j patel | 10 | view |
- Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society.To what extent do you agree? 73
- The line graph below show the population size birth and death rate of ENgland and Whales from 1700 to 2000 70
- The chart below shows the male and female internet users aged 15 24 in Canada in 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 55
- The chart below shows information about the challenges people face when they go to live in othe countries. 67
- The graph below shows total Internet users in Vietnan from 2003 to the second quarter 2012 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 23, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nada in 2000. According to the graph , lots of females were used in internet a...
^^
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Females
...ities. Most of female were sent emails. females were jigher than malesin mail category....
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, secondly, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 33.7804878049 36% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 491.0 965.302439024 51% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 95.0 196.424390244 48% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16842105263 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.12198564135 3.73543355544 84% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36398670887 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 65.0 106.607317073 61% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.684210526316 0.547539520022 125% => OK
syllable_count: 156.6 283.868780488 55% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 22.4926829268 49% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.1932505221 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 61.375 112.824112599 54% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.875 22.9334400587 52% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170115016546 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0709822696857 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624712901512 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146871570908 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0269640300846 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.31 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.82 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.9970731707 58% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 22.4719101124 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.