The graphs show changes in spending habits of people in UK between 1971 and 2001. Write a report to a university lecturer describing the data.
The given pie charts compare information about spending patterns in UK between 1971 and 2001. The charts also show a further classification by seven groups of goods.
As an overall trend, the proportion of all sectors changed significantly over the thirty-year period. Foods and cars made up to the two biggest section of expenditure in both years.
In detail, while amount of money spent on automobile dramatically increased from 22% in 1971 to 43% in 2001, the figure for food decline, by 30% from the 1971 figure of 44%. There were other small drops in the figures for petrol and furniture, which she a fall by 2% and 1% from 1971 respectively. The lowest proportion was 1% of shopping books in 2001, plunged from 6% in the initial year.
Other areas changed considerably, spending on eating out doubled, climbing from 7% to 14%. Likely, the rise was in the salary spent on computers, it grew from 2% to 12% over the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-20 | Phạm Phú Trường | 84 | view |
| 2018-06-04 | Thien Trang | 78 | view |
| 2018-02-11 | Thira | 84 | view |
| 2016-12-27 | sabzaliyev | 73 | view |
- The best way to solve the world’s environmental problems to increase the costs of fuels. Do you agree or disagree?? 11
- Writing, reading and maths are the three major subjects. Some people think that computer skills should be added as a fourth subject. What extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- The bar chart below shows the number of houses built per year in two cities Derby and Nottingham Between 2000 and 2009 54
- Scientists predict that humans will speak the same language in the future. Do you think it is a positive or negative development? ? 70
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why students chose to study at a particular UK university in 1987 and in 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 183, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t section of expenditure in both years. In detail, while amount of money spent o...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 392, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...1, plunged from 6% in the initial year. Other areas changed considerably, spendi...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 775.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78395061728 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71866456588 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641975308642 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 216.0 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.599835966 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.1111111111 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153378165939 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605053854 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633942430821 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0886160164669 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628730764689 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.