The graphs illustrate about computer ownership as the percentage of population between the years 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for only two years; 2002 and 2010.
From the data given in the first bar graph it can be seen that the computer ownership was almost 55 percentage in the year 2002. The share of population owning computer is constantly increasing over the period of time. In 2010 almost three quarter people possess computer.
The second bar graph shows computer ownership by education level in the years 2002 and 2010. The number of people possessing computer increased in general irrespective of their education level. The most significant rise is seen in people without high school diploma from mere 15 percentage in 2002 to almost 40 percentage in 2010. The percentages of people owning computers with a high school graduate degree, incomplete college, bachelor's degree and post graduate degree also rose from 40, 55, 70 and 80 to 65, 85, 90 and 95 respectively.
To conclude it can be said that the number of computer owners increased over the period of eight years. The rise of percentage is most in people with no high school diploma. This increase in percentage reduces with the people with higher education degrees.
- Schools are spending more time teaching traditional subjects such as history. Some people think they should rather spend more time in teaching skills that can help students find a job.To what extent do you agree or disagree. 61
- The graph below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 an 2010 and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 71
- Some people think that managers alone should make decisions in the company, while others think that employees should be involved in the decision-making process too. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- Learning English at school is often seen as more important than learning local languages .If these are not taught many are at risk of dying out.In your opinion ,is it important for everyone to learn English?Should we try to ensure the survival of local la 56
- Advantages and disadvantages of mobile phones in our daily lives 96
The given bar graph compares…
The given bar graph compares the proportions of people who owned computers in years 2002 and 2010. The data has been measured in percentage, and people have been classified in accordance to their level of education.
The figures make it obvious that during the given years, the more people were educated, more they were likely to have their own computers. Moreover, there had been an increase in the number of people with the possession of computers over the given years.
To be more specific, pupils with no high school diploma owned least computers. Their percentage, in years 2002 and 2010, was almost 13% and 38% respectively. High school graduates, relatively, had more computers with the figures 35% and 73% in years 2002 and 2010. Clearly, more than 50% and 80% ownership was shown by college students while those with a bachelor's degree turned out to be roughly 70% and 80%. The number of postgraduates remained at the peak during the entire given period of time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...puter is constantly increasing over the period of time. In 2010 almost three quarter people po...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 195, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... irrespective of their education level. The most significant rise is seen in people...
^^^
Line 5, column 332, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...n 2002 to almost 40 percentage in 2010. The percentages of people owning computers ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1046.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.004784689 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6252555607 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516746411483 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.7264222182 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0909090909 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.54545454545 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319379613797 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144923542072 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.156512986615 0.0843802449381 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253252645575 0.15604864568 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.175288980685 0.0819641961636 214% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.07 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.