animal testing
Perhaps no subject in moral society is as controversial as animal-based experiments. While many people criticize animal testings and believe they merit humane treatment, I am of the opinion that these tests are essential to the well-being of both human beings and that of animals.
First of all, there is little doubt that many experiments make huge contributions to the technology development and to date, there is little chance of finding a satisfying substitution. Indeed, animals are often used mainly since they bear a striking resemblance to humans, either in cell structure or in behaviors. To be more specific, they respond to the external disturbances such as electrical shock in the same manner as humans do. As a result, these tests become the main approach to anticipate risks when new products or drugs are prepared as medicine to be used on humans.
In addition, another fact supports animal-based experiments is that animals are not equivalent to humans and they can be utilized as resources for humans' sake purposes. Obviously, animals have no capacity to consider rights and interests of other species, which is the reason why they feed on each other. Humans, on the other hand, conduct animal testings not only for their own sake but also for the benefits of other species. For instance, multiple medical achievements are applied in veterinary surgeries to give medical treatment and medicine to sick animals.
Despite the justification given for vivisection, scientists have obligations to reduce animal testings as well as animal suffering. In fact, there is a growing recognition that the majority of these tests are being exploited for commercial purposes. For example, the cosmetic industry is diversifying products and maximizing profits by slaughtering numerous animals. However, this circumstance can be ceased only if scientists do not abuse their power by conducting cruel experiments for unessential objectives.
In summary, one can subscribe to the notion that animals are resources intended for human purposes, although meanwhile it is certain that suffering should be controlled to the minimum during experimentation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in fact, in summary, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1828.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44047619048 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04905448896 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1464703437 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.866666667 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341433737316 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119013762922 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117323718927 0.0667982634062 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20711239436 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0915867903659 0.056905535591 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.