All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
"Team management and co ordination is the key success for any company to develop and become one of the best"
While some people feel that spending more money on outside consultants for company to operate more efficiently, many are of the opinion that spending that same amount of money on your own employees for the best of the company or to operate efficiently. On one hand it is the consultants outside in the market, on the other hand it is your own employees being trained to be more productive for the company. I am of the opinion that, investing that amount of money in training your own employee is the best.
The chief reason for my view is bringing in or hiring outside consultant who doesn't know the company policies, company standards or the framework of that company how it works, its difficult to train such outsides. Instead the company can the train their own employees who knows companies standard, rules, how it works is best. For example, Google one of the booming IT company in today's IT sector, the people working or being part of Google only suggests how the company can be modified to get more efficient. Hence choosing your own employees is best.
Another reason for my view is, the cost that the company invests outside is a humongous amount. Suppose if the they invest a lot and the efficiency is low, the quality is low. Then the time might be nearing to shut down the company. So instead of investing more money on outside consultants for suggestion train your own. For example, a school can hire a teacher who was already graduated from the same school. So teacher might know better about the school.
However at some point it is an ambiguous situation, we have more options when we go look out in the market for good consultants. But this might not be easy every time. Its difficult to search if the company has a deadline day nearing. After weighing both the side we can conclude that training your own employees for suggesting ways to increase the efficiency is the best option.
For all the reasons stated above, I believe that, a company choosing their own employees is the best compared to hiring consultants who goes after sometime or we need to pay them again to take their help.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | Arpit Sahni | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | shamitha | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | JENIRSHAH | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | caseya5 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Siddiqur Rahman | 50 | view |
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary. 50
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 78, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ing in or hiring outside consultant who doesnt know the company policies, company stan...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 215, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
..., its difficult to train such outsides. Instead the company can the train their own emp...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 370, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'companies'?
Suggestion: companies
...r example, Google one of the booming IT company in todays IT sector, the people working...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 511, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... can be modified to get more efficient. Hence choosing your own employees is best. ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 108, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'they'?
Suggestion: the; they
...tside is a humongous amount. Suppose if the they invest a lot and the efficiency is low,...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...er might know better about the school. However at some point it is an ambiguous situat...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, look, so, then, while, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1846.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 393.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69720101781 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50355560399 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473282442748 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.1964409173 60.3974514979 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.555555556 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.427290105406 0.243740707755 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129076820891 0.0831039109588 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102202077156 0.0758088955206 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220126088451 0.150359130593 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0936990470927 0.0667264976115 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 48.8420337079 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 100.480337079 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.8971910112 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.