Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet was in fact painted by Rembrandt
In contrast with the reading passage, the lecturer states that the painting known as the Portrait of an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet was in fact painted by Rembrandt. The teacher gives three reasons to support this claim.
First of all, she answers to the fur collar issue. According to the passage, that detail would be inconsistent with the rest of the painting because the woman in it dresses an outfit that would only be weared by a servant, hence she wouldn't be able to afford such an expensive item. The lecturer, however, argues that new scientific evidence suggests that the fur collar was painted many years after the original painting.
Closely linked with that discovery is the fact that the dark fur collar actually covered a light colored piece of clothe, which would reflect light on the woman's face. That explains the shadowing problem mentioned in the passage.
Last but not least, the teacher explains that several wood pieces were added in order to enlarge the original painting. That refutes the passage's argument that excludes this painting because Rembrandt has never glued together a panel in any of his paintings. In addition, new research has shown that the piece of wood used in the original painting is the same kind used in the Rembrandt's self portrait.
To sum up, the lecturer offers explanations to all the problems brought up by the reading passage, from the woman's clothes and the shadows to the wood panel.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-06 | YasamanEsml | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | ayumiyazaki | 81 | view |
| 2022-12-09 | Kairavishah2001 | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-16 | rpinisetti8 | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-13 | EiLonMask | 73 | view |
- The following appeared in an e-mail sent by the marketing director of the Classical Shakespeare Theatre of Bardville."Over the past ten years, there has been a 20 percent decline in the size of the average audience at Classical Shakespeare Theatre product 72
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. 30
- College students should be encouraged to pursue subjects that interest them rather than the courses that seem most likely to lead to jobs.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 75
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the owner of Movies Galore, a chain of video rental stores.“In order to reverse the recent decline in our profits, we must reduce operating expenses at Movies Galore’s ten video rental stores. Since we are f 68
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes littl 32
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
In contrast with the reading passage, the lecturer ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 233, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
... only be weared by a servant, hence she wouldnt be able to afford such an expensive ite...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 137, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'passages'' or 'passage's'?
Suggestion: passages'; passage's
...the original painting. That refutes the passages argument that excludes this painting be...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, hence, however, if, so, in addition, in contrast, in fact, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1201.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 246.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88211382114 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38170103807 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565040650407 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 357.3 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2503831515 49.2860985944 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.181818182 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3636363636 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.45454545455 7.06452816374 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301503016312 0.272083759551 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.097990745688 0.0996497079465 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.161851488014 0.0662205650399 244% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161860255027 0.162205337803 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.164289534672 0.0443174109184 371% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.