Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective?
It is argued that the best solution for growing traffic and pollution could be to rise the petrol price. Although I agree that it could be a correct solution, I think that there are more efficient ways to stop these problems.
On the one hand, if the price of petrol increases, people will be discouraged to move by car. For this reason, they are encouraged by the fact that there are other ways to move around the city or to reach a destination. In this case, a growth in the use of alternatives means of transport will be recorded. For instance, people colud move on foot or by public transport, and bike, which are not causes of the high level of pollution in the air.
On the other hand, statistics suggest us that petrol is not the unique cause of pollution and growing traffic. It is clear that there are many other reasons for those. Therefore, the increase of petrol price does not seem the best way to solve these problems. Moreover, in this way, the use of petrol could be reduced, but it is impossible to eliminate it definetely. For this reason, it is more correct to focus on the other causes and on their solution. For example, governments could introduce a tax for industries where exhaust fumes are produced, or the use of polluting chemicals should be banned.
In my opinion, though I agree that increasing the petrol price could be a good solution, I think that governments must pay attention to the consequences of this. If it happens, it will be avoided the facing of economic problems deriving from the high price of petrol. For this, there might be other measures which have to be taken as a prize for people who do more kilometres with non-polluting transports in a year.
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevan 78
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective? 56
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevan 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, for instance, i think, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1402.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61184210526 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60861692693 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486842105263 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.2768522133 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.4666666667 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281021704647 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105866709855 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712860792107 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194518629821 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660554021116 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 12.4159519038 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.