Law can change human behavior. Do you agree or not?
Recently, the phenomenon of law to change human behavior and its corresponding impact sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many the matter of law enforcement is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that studying the impacts of law on human behavior can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, social and civil regulations can provide the society with some noticeable effects which rooted in the fact that increasing the crime rate, as well as developing discipline, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the influence of law enforcement on human behavior. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both respecting to citizen’s right and the betterment of the community apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of social legislation, observing law might increase the consequences of security in the society. Moreover, fundamental aspects of obtaining stricter rules would relate to this reality that the demerits of behavioral corruption pertain to breaking law. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a tangible university has asserted that he downside of death penalties is correlated negatively to the absence of law. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of law enforcement on peoples’ actions.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of law and regulations in the society outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of precise legislation prove the significance of law on human behavior, but also pinpoint legal implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-01 | kamyar.diba | 55 | view |
| 2021-08-01 | kamyar.diba | 55 | view |
| 2021-07-31 | kamyar.diba | 55 | view |
| 2021-07-31 | kamyar.diba | 55 | view |
| 2019-11-05 | yasamin.gharib62 | 88 | view |
- Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing, skydiving, bungee jumping or not? What are the reasons for that? 85
- Can the Internet replace the classroom teacher? Discuss your views. 11
- Modern innovations of antibiotic, computer and airplane, which one is the most important and why? 89
- Do you think English will remain a global language despite globalization? Discuss your views with examples. 78
- Polygamy has led to massive divorce rates around the globe. Give the possible option for this issue and various solutions to reduce the rate. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1558.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 280.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56428571429 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2971539985 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621428571429 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8735812137 50.4703680194 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.833333333 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320687109258 0.242375264174 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10805734817 0.0925447433944 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0813873956844 0.071462118173 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181798470422 0.151781067708 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0615213578325 0.0609392437508 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.87 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.