The subject of whether or not a nation's greatness would be identified by people's welfare or it rulers and prominent people is a contentious issue and I would play as an advocate of this. I believe the last point of achievements in a society is the welfare of its people. Public welfare rises from an important characteristic of a nation and that is justice and justice is one of the factors which can be taken into account as a greatness of a nation. besides that, welfare indicates interfering with the economical scientist in government and administrative components of it.
First, when you talk about the welfare of people of a nation, exactly you are talking about a result and you're not on a path. Welfare and same distribution of equipment and facilities show a deep understanding and modern thought of that society. let's suppose swiss and compare it with Pakistan country. Maybe in comparison, you find more artists and scientist in Pakistan with respect to Swiss but in contrast, you could find lots of poor people as you do in Pakistan. Having great prominent people and intelligent scientists are potentials that they should be in practice to reach important goals like the welfare of most people in a society.
secondly, when we talk about the greatness of a nation we should define what factors play a role as factors of a greatness of a society. The factors like justice and public welfare and etc are important factors. These factors make a nation great and we have to know the greatness of people could not generate autonomously and it depends on some characteristic that has the strong connection with people's behavior and depth of their understanding.
Some may argue that if you put away this indicator you will scratch important tools which have been used by most of the historian authors around the world. They always have been pointing out to this features when they wanted to mention and talk about the greatness of a society and not taking elites into account is a great ignorance is studying a society's feature like the greatness of it. I would state that as I said you could conclude some results from the potential when the potential comes into practice you can take it into account and this is the relation of greatness and scientist of society. When a scientist has no access to put his idea into practice he or she will be like a decore.
At last, I believe that even big achievements in the past, having great scientists, which a society could possess could not indicate a society's greatness. And we could not take these factors into consideration and compare this with other societies.
- TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people 60
- TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiri 76
- The general welfare of a nation's people is a better indication of that nation's greatness than are the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disag 42
- TPO-07 - Integrated Writing Task In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recyclin 78
- TPO-05 - Integrated Writing Task As early as the twelfth century A.D., the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their "great houses," massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand th 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 16, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
The subject of whether or not a nations greatness would be identified...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 33, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
The subject of whether or not a nations greatness would be identified by people...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 452, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Besides
...nto account as a greatness of a nation. besides that, welfare indicates interfering wit...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: you're
...ctly you are talking about a result and youre not on a path. Welfare and same distrib...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 247, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Lets
...ing and modern thought of that society. lets suppose swiss and compare it with Pakis...
^^^^
Line 3, column 247, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...ing and modern thought of that society. lets suppose swiss and compare it with Pakis...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
...elfare of most people in a society. secondly, when we talk about the greatness of a ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...pth of their understanding. Some may argue that if you put away this indicator you...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 162, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[7]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put between 'have' and 'been'.
Suggestion: have always been
...istorian authors around the world. They always have been pointing out to this features when they...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 195, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
.... They always have been pointing out to this features when they wanted to mention an...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, in contrast, talking about, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2176.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 453.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80353200883 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75995579021 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.432671081678 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 677.7 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.777569146 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.888888889 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1666666667 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27777777778 5.21951772744 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255601837729 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847396879006 0.0831039109588 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542730156918 0.0758088955206 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150428603344 0.150359130593 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499878699261 0.0667264976115 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.