the charts below show the proportion of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
The pie charts compare the percentage of British students studding in a specific university who were bilingual or multilingual in the years 2000 and 2010.
It is clear that the proportion of students who were able to speak English along with another language in this university increased. We can also see that the popularity of French language decreased over this time.
In 2000, the most common foreign language among British students was Spanish as if 30%of them mastered this language, and it kept its popularity by 2010 when more than one third of students were able to speak Spanish. The second popular language in 2000 was French, with 15% of total speakers. However, fewer students were interested in French in 2010, at just 10 per cent.
The percentage of monolingual students saw an increase from 10% to 15%, while the total proportion of learners who were just able to speak English decreased, with 20 % and 10% in the years 2000 and 2010 respectively. German was the only language which students embraced it equally over this period, at just 10%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | ppatel | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Duong Linh | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-24 | nguyentuananh76 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Jesslynindah | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Gre user | 78 | view |
- The tendency of human to copy one another is shown in the popularity of fashion clothes and consumer goods. To what extend do you agree? 89
- Over the last few decades the media has promoted the image of young thin women as being ideal What problem has this caused What solutions can you suggest to this issue 76
- As computers can translate all languages very quickly and accurately learning a foreign language is a waste of time To what extend do you agree or disagree 77
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as the South Pole What are advantages and disadvantages of this development 66
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 883.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93296089385 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59221888841 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581005586592 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8579392298 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.375 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.419130126867 0.215688989381 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.186206617544 0.103423049105 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105418841993 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266529111444 0.15604864568 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0187325194125 0.0819641961636 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.