The best way to resolve the international environmentalproblems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

The best way to resolve the international environmental
problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

International experts have proposed many solutions to tackle global environmental issues. While raising fuel prices would be a useful measure to fight climate change, I disagree that it would represent the best way to alleviate environmental problems.

National authorities should raise taxes on the cost of fuel. By adopting this policy, governments would almost certainly ensure that people used their cars less. Fewer car journeys would mean a reduction in exhaust emissions. This would have global consequences, slowing the process of global warming as the quantity of greenhouse gases released into the atmosphere was reduced. In terms of the depletion of natural resources, world supplies of oil will not last forever, and by increasing petrol prices there would be less; dependence on fossil fuels. Thus, I believe that international bodies should exert pressure on countries to raise fuel prices.

However, I would argue that there are more effective ways to tackle international environmental problems. Firstly, from the perspective of transport policy, introducing restrictions on the use of private vehicles must be high on the government agenda in all countries. For example, the congestion charge on vehicles in London has improved air quality. Secondly, governments must allocate resources to the development of alternative energy sources to power motor vehicles and machinery used in factory production. Finally, as part of the wider effort to achieve sustainable development, international cooperation to share scientific knowledge and advances in technology should be a top priority. This would range across issues such as the exploitation of renewable energy, marine conservation and the reclamation of agricultural land, halting the spread of deserts in places such as sub-Saharan Africa.

In conclusion, although raising the cost of fuel would be a welcome measure, more effective steps are required to deal with a wider range of global environmental tissues.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-06-12 bhatvishal@ 61 view
2018-09-15 gilpin2010 67 view
2018-09-15 gilpin2010 56 view
2018-04-05 tuannguyen306 84 view
2017-06-17 shabnameghbalian 61 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1690.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65217391304 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09114424784 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622073578595 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5400190309 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.666666667 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9333333333 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115106851005 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0403025002001 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458408569618 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0783523271001 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348805170944 0.056905535591 61% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.