The best way to resolve the international environmental
problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
International experts have proposed many solutions to tackle global environmental issues.
While raising fuel prices would be a useful measure to fight climate change, I disagree that it
would represent the best way to alleviate environmental problems.
National authorities should raise taxes on the cost of fuel. By adopting this policy,
governments would almost certainly ensure that people used their cars less. Fewer car journeys
would mean a reduction in exhaust emissions. This would have global consequences, slowing
the process of global warming as the quantity of greenhouse gases released into the
atmosphere was reduced. In terms of the depletion of natural resources, world supplies of
oil will not last forever, and by increasing petrol prices there would be less; dependence on
fossil fuels. Thus, I believe that international bodies should exert pressure on countries to
raise fuel prices.
However, I would argue that there are more effective ways to tackle international
environmental problems. Firstly, from the perspective of transport policy, introducing
restrictions on the use of private vehicles must be high on the government agenda in all
countries. For example, the congestion charge on vehicles in London has improved air
quality. Secondly, governments must allocate resources to the development of alternative
energy sources to power motor vehicles and machinery used in factory production. Finally,
as part of the wider effort to achieve sustainable development, international cooperation to
share scientific knowledge and advances in technology should be a top priority. This would
range across issues such as the exploitation of renewable energy, marine conservation and the
reclamation of agricultural land, halting the spread of deserts in places such as sub-Saharan
Africa.
In conclusion, although raising the cost of fuel would be a welcome measure, more effective
steps are required to deal with a wider range of global environmental tissues.
- The best way to resolve the international environmentalproblems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The best way to resolve the international environmentalproblems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 67
- The best way to resolve the international environmentalproblems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- When choosing a job, the salary is the most important consideration. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1730.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.78595317726 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09114424784 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622073578595 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1395949508 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.333333333 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9333333333 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 22.0 4.38176352705 502% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115106851005 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0403025002001 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458408569618 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0304258496985 0.151304729494 20% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404859434115 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.