The best way to resolve the international environmental
problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Over the past decades, degradation and deterioration of habitats has become increasingly serious resulting in urgent demand for solution. While raising the fuels considered as an effective method to tackle this issue, I disagree that it would represent the best way to alleviate resource depletion.
Official authorities should raise taxes on the cost of fuel. This would lead to reduction of fuel usage in public transports. Fewer emissions would mean slowing the pace of global warming as the amount of carbon emission released into the atmosphere was reduced. Besides, cutting down on exhaust emission also means we need more alternative energy sources such as sun and wind energy. For example, solar-powered cars are a technological innovation known for environmentally friendly products. Investing in these green energies can extend the life of the earth once fossil fuels are running out.
However, there is no denying that there are more effective ways to address the environmental issues. Firstly, the pollution of environment is closely related to environmental protection consciousness of people. Instead of increasing the fuel cost, habitat conservation propaganda must be of prime concern by authorities. Secondly, government should have stricter punishment for environmental criminals who directly harms the habitat. These people should be required to pay a huge fine or must be sentenced to imprisonment. Once law becomes more severe, it makes individuals more aware of protecting, preserving and restoring the environment.
In conclusion, although raising expenses for fuel considered as a feasible measure, more powerful approaches should also be adopted to deal with a wider range of global environment problems.
- The best way to resolve the international environmentalproblems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The best way to resolve the international environmentalproblems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 67
- The best way to resolve the international environmentalproblems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- When choosing a job, the salary is the most important consideration. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67049808429 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12552574811 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.689655172414 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.1763197951 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6666666667 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115472175327 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0397113334923 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495091818474 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0714038208776 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399799987873 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.31 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.53 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.