The argument revolves around Palean woven Baskets and its uniqueness. The author states that art of making the woven basket was a distinct and limited to Palean people, proceeding the argument to draw attention to the new study revealing that it was not a distinct feature of Palean community and it might have come from a different area which is unrevealed to us. My opinion on this argument is ambivalent as there are some points which should be known to conclude accurately.
If we carefully read the argument, it states that a distinct pattern of woven baskets was found from nearby areas of Palea and that is why they assumed that it was made by only Palean people. The author stated only an assumption and beliefs. It is possible that Palean community have gained this art from their ancestors which might belong to another tribe and after decaying of that tribe, it thoroughly transferred to Palean community
The stated argument further asserts that recent research by archeologists across Brim river reveals that those woven baskets are discovered in another area, Lithos, which is on opposite side of Brim from Palea. Also, the only way to reach Lithos from Palean is by boat and Paleans are not having any boat. That led the author's conclusion to state that the art of woven baskets is not ancient to Palea. Here, the author has not mentioned that the discovered amount of woven basket was in ample amount or there are very few. It is possible that Lithos people have procured some of those baskets and stored it which found after many years.
Also, it is possible that Brim river had flooded, flushing Palean and bringing some baskets to the Lithos. Lithos people stored it and used it. So, the argument needs some more clarification by which it can be concluded whether the art of woven basket is distinct or not and my views are skeptic towards the same.
- 1.Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, arc 23
- A recently issued twenty-year study on headaches suffered by the residents of Mentia investigated the possible therapeutic effect of consuming salicylates. Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin, a medicine used to treat headaches. 58
- "We recommend that Monarch Books open a café in its store. Monarch, having been in business at the same location for more than twenty years, has a large customer base because it is known for its wide selection of books on all subjects. Clearly, opening t 30
- Claim: Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate, practical application.Reason: It is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty.W 50
- People rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of human to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. Write a respond in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 33
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
the arguments are not exactly right on the point.
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 325 350
No. of Characters: 1519 1500
No. of Different Words: 148 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.246 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.674 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.341 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 109 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 68 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 45 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 23 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.214 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 12.066 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.286 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.37 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.547 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.108 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 320, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...s are not having any boat. That led the authors conclusion to state that the art of wov...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.6327345309 112% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.9520958084 31% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 11.1786427146 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 13.6137724551 147% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 28.8173652695 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 55.5748502994 70% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 16.3942115768 55% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 2260.96107784 69% => OK
No of words: 325.0 441.139720559 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77846153846 5.12650576532 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36661994009 2.78398813304 85% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 204.123752495 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.470769230769 0.468620217663 100% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 705.55239521 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.96107784431 141% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.22255489022 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 19.7664670659 66% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.8473053892 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 100.088540684 57.8364921388 173% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.461538462 119.503703932 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 23.324526521 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.923076923077 5.70786347227 16% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.20758483034 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.67664670659 128% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226357624925 0.218282227539 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0900035722643 0.0743258471296 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618603490812 0.0701772020484 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153361545978 0.128457276422 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549228812774 0.0628817314937 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.3799401198 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.3550499002 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 12.5979740519 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.32208582834 96% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 98.500998004 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 12.3882235529 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.1389221557 108% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.