As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.

The stated issue claims that the human ability to think will deteriorate if people rely more on technology to solve their problems. People invent technology to make their lives easier. From that point of view, given statement seems false as it is a gift of human thoughts towards ameliorating situations only. I disagree with the statement.

Long ago, people had difficulties in the transportation of goods and the only option they had to go to any place is by walking. This problem led humans to think about a solution which gave birth to vehicles. So, it enhanced the power of thinking instead of making it worse. Massive calculations needed experts, which we are doing in seconds from our mobile phones or computers and we don't have to rely on those virtuosos to do the same. This example also shows that problems of massive calculations led us to think towards the same and enhanced our thoughts. Though, the human ability to calculate those calculations is decreased as they reply only on programs.

Everything has limitations and technology is not perfect. It also creates a problem which are leading our minds to another direction and enhancing cognitive ability. Everyone is relying on vehicles for transportation but it pollutes the environment and also human forgot to walk to improve their health by walking. But, both of these problems are going to be abated one day. People are making environment-friendly vehicles to protect it from the pollution. Also, they are having many applications which can track their routine and advice for their better health.

It depends on the usage of technology that it will be harmful or harmless but the cognitive ability will increase and keep giving us new ideas to solve our problems. It will not deteriorate. I disagree with the statement.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 385, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...m our mobile phones or computers and we dont have to rely on those virtuosos to do t...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, as to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 2235.4752809 67% => OK
No of words: 299.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02006688963 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85776510585 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551839464883 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 704.065955056 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.3418416251 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.0 118.986275619 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7368421053 23.4991977007 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.68421052632 5.21951772744 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299386948016 0.243740707755 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.087322439728 0.0831039109588 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124356508243 0.0758088955206 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188875877787 0.150359130593 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105807213573 0.0667264976115 159% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.8420337079 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 100.480337079 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.