"According to a recent report by our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actually increased during the last year. Clearly, the content of these reviews is not reaching enough of our prospective viewers. Thus, the problem lies not in the quality of our movies but with public's lack of awareness that movies of good quality are available. Super Screen should therefore allocate a greater quantity of its budget next year to reaching the public through advertising.
Regarding the concepts of the department of marketing, they assumed that it was the public who turned out to be unaware of the quality of the movies that had been provided by the Super Screen Produced movies. It was found that the number of people attending the super screen movies dampens as compared to the last year. So, it is a prerequisite for the movie's producer to advertise their movies in an effective way so that they can be reached out to the public.
The recent report of the marketing department implies that it was the lack of the advertising because of which the numbers of the people attending the movies sapped. Inadequate amount of the money may also be the pivotal reason which the numbers of the audience were declining. The quality of the film may also have been bad. The reviewers appointed for the review may be also prejudiced because of which limpid review regarding the movie may be halted. The redundant story may also have exact a toll on the audience during the full time watching the movie.
There should have been the effective provision of a minimal cost of the ticket so that it can be reached out and as well as it can be afforded by various people to watch the movie. Not only does the Super Screen produce the movie every year there should be a certain time gap between the movies. So that it can urge a sense of excitement among the various people and compel and lure them to watch the movie. It would be helpful for the film producers to reduce the scintilla amount of the movie budget in an advertisement as compared to the movie itself.
Many specifications still need to be mentioned so that the success of the super screen produced may be achieved. They should not use prejudiced and fledgling movie reviewers for the movie. They should carry out the advertisement in a gripping manner so that it can lure many public and urge them to watch the movies. So these may help the super screen produced movie to get more audience and taste the epitome of the success of the various types of the movies in nearby future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-25 | rubelmonir | 16 | view |
| 2023-07-25 | rubelmonir | 60 | view |
| 2023-07-23 | Mizanur_Rahman | 50 | view |
| 2023-02-14 | tedyang777 | 60 | view |
| 2022-11-13 | barath002 | 58 | view |
- A ten year nationwide study of the effectiveness of wearing a helmet while bicycling indicates that ten years ago approximately 35 percent of all bicyclists reported wearing helmets whereas today that number is nearly 80 percent Another study however sugg 63
- According to a recent report by our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actual 59
- Benton City residents have adopted healthier lifestyles A recent survey of city residents shows that the eating habits of city residents conform more closely to government nutritional recommendations than they did ten years ago During those ten years loca 58
- It is inevitable that as technology advances traditional cultures will be lost It seems that we cannot have these two things together To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Benton City residents have adopted healthier lifestyles A recent survey of city residents shows that the eating habits of city residents conform more closely to government nutritional recommendations than they did ten years ago During those ten years loca 65
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 5 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 371 350
No. of Characters: 1665 1500
No. of Different Words: 155 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.389 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.488 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.377 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 115 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 70 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 45 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 30 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.188 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.161 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.688 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.409 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.589 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.145 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 354, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'movies'' or 'movie's'?
Suggestion: movies'; movie's
... year. So, it is a prerequisite for the movies producer to advertise their movies in a...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 396, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an effective way" with adverb for "effective"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...vies producer to advertise their movies in an effective way so that they can be reached out to the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 455, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...view regarding the movie may be halted. The redundant story may also have exact a t...
^^^
Line 3, column 529, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...exact a toll on the audience during the full time watching the movie. There should hav...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, regarding, so, still, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.6327345309 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.9520958084 139% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 13.6137724551 95% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 28.8173652695 94% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 55.5748502994 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 16.3942115768 49% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 2260.96107784 75% => OK
No of words: 371.0 441.139720559 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56603773585 5.12650576532 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.56307096286 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40973365394 2.78398813304 87% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 204.123752495 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.401617250674 0.468620217663 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 535.5 705.55239521 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59920159681 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 19.7664670659 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.8473053892 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1882160326 57.8364921388 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.875 119.503703932 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1875 23.324526521 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3125 5.70786347227 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.20758483034 122% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301140342061 0.218282227539 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119149007074 0.0743258471296 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0967695403467 0.0701772020484 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206052496131 0.128457276422 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053998468178 0.0628817314937 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.3799401198 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 48.3550499002 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.197005988 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 12.5979740519 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.32208582834 91% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 98.500998004 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 12.3882235529 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.1389221557 101% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.