According to a recent report by our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actually increased during the last year. Clearly, the content of these reviews is not reaching enough of our prospective viewers. Thus, the problem lies not in the quality of our movies but with public's lack of awareness that movies of good quality are available. Super Screen should therefore allocate a greater quantity of its budget next year to reaching the public through advertising.
The argument claims that the percentage of positive reviews through movie reviewers increases in but fewer people attended the theatre because of lack of awareness in public that the movies quality ids good enough. So super screen should increase their budget to reaching the public through advertising. Stated in this way that the argument fails to mention several key factors, on the basis of which it could be evaluated. The conclusion relies on assumptions for which there is no clear evidence, Hence the argument is very weak, unconvincing and has several flaws.
First, the argument readily assumes that though the reviews through movie reviewers increases in past year but fewer people attended movie theater to watch movie. This statement is a stretch and not substantiated in any way. Because it is not clear that movie ratings may not be the only issue for fewer attendance. For example in some cases the review system may given in a negative ratings. The author didn't mention clearly this ratings are positive. So the maximum ratings may be negative thats why public may not concern to watch this movie in theater. Though increase in movie ratings, it increases in a negative point of view. So we are not clear about it. The argument could have been much clearer if it explicitly stated that the movie ratings are negative or positive.
Second, the argument claims that the contents of reviews are not reaching prospective viewers. It suggests that this is another reason to not reaching the movie review in prospective viewers. This is again a weak and unsupported claim as the argument does not demonstrate any correlation between prospective viewers and movie reviewers. If any correlation between reviewer and viewer , the author would much more convincing. We do not know anything about why they are not connected. If the argument had provided evidence about correlation between viewers and reviewers then the argument would have been a lot more convincing.
Finally, the arguments concludes that the problem lies public lack of awareness. So super screen should increase their budget next to reaching the public through advertising. This is not a clear evidence. How only increased budget through advertising concern the viewers about the movie. Without convincing answer to this question, one is left with the impression that the claim is more of a wishful thinking rather than substantiate evidence.
In conclusion, the argument is flawed for the above mentioned reasons and is therefore unconvincing. It could be considerably strengthen if the author mentions clearly all the relevant facts. In order to assess the merits of a certain situation, it is essential to have full knowledge of all contributing factors. Without this information , the argument remains unsubstantiated and open to debate.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-25 | rubelmonir | 16 | view |
| 2023-07-25 | rubelmonir | 60 | view |
| 2023-07-23 | Mizanur_Rahman | 50 | view |
| 2023-02-14 | tedyang777 | 60 | view |
| 2022-11-13 | barath002 | 58 | view |
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 50
- According to a recent report by our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actual 60
- According to a recent report by our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actual 16
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 4 2
No. of Sentences: 28 15
No. of Words: 455 350
No. of Characters: 2318 1500
No. of Different Words: 198 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.619 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.095 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.675 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 181 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 143 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 90 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 50 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.25 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.133 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.571 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.282 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.475 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.07 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 365, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[3]
Message: Did you mean 'give' or 'be given'?
Suggestion: give; be given
...ple in some cases the review system may given in a negative ratings. The author didnt...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 385, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'rating'?
Suggestion: rating
...e review system may given in a negative ratings. The author didnt mention clearly this ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 405, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...given in a negative ratings. The author didnt mention clearly this ratings are positi...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 427, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...tings. The author didnt mention clearly this ratings are positive. So the maximum ra...
^^^^
Line 3, column 493, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
... So the maximum ratings may be negative thats why public may not concern to watch thi...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 384, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... correlation between reviewer and viewer , the author would much more convincing. ...
^^
Line 9, column 3, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rather than substantiate evidence. In conclusion, the argument is flawed for t...
^^
Line 9, column 340, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...buting factors. Without this information , the argument remains unsubstantiated an...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, hence, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, for example, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.6327345309 117% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.9520958084 85% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 11.1786427146 98% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 13.6137724551 88% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 28.8173652695 111% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 55.5748502994 94% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 16.3942115768 152% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2374.0 2260.96107784 105% => OK
No of words: 454.0 441.139720559 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22907488987 5.12650576532 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.56307096286 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76120440554 2.78398813304 99% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 204.123752495 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.453744493392 0.468620217663 97% => OK
syllable_count: 720.9 705.55239521 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.96107784431 161% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.76447105788 114% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 19.7664670659 142% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.8473053892 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.8106968243 57.8364921388 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.7857142857 119.503703932 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2142857143 23.324526521 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.70786347227 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.25449101796 152% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 17.0 6.88822355289 247% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232369750764 0.218282227539 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0611297715316 0.0743258471296 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0788348125301 0.0701772020484 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120373373433 0.128457276422 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0803303626931 0.0628817314937 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.3799401198 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.3550499002 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.197005988 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.5979740519 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.32208582834 95% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 98.500998004 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.1389221557 75% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.