According to a recent report by our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actual

Essay topics:

According to a recent report by our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actually increased during the last year. Clearly, the content of these reviews is not reaching enough of our prospective viewers. Thus, the problem lies not in the quality of our movies but with public's lack of awareness that movies of good quality are available. Super Screen should therefore allocate a greater quantity of its budget next year to reaching the public through advertising.

In the argument, the director concludes that, despite producing good qualities of movies by their production company people are not coming to watch their movies and people are less responsive and they are less aware about the good quality of the movies. The director comes to the conclusion based on the observation that, though the people attended very low in the theature then the previous years but the percenrage of positive reviews is really high compared to the previous years. While the claim drawn in the argument might ultimately prove valid, the argument still needs to answer 3 crucial pieces of questions in order to bolster it's argument.

First of all, the main question is whether the people who are going to movie theature are they representing the whole bunch of people of the society? Perhaps, the people who are going to theature they are only a smaller portion of the society and they will go to the movie theature whatever the quality of the movies is, even if the quality of the movie is very low still they will go for watching it. It is also possible that, The people are now much more comfortable to watch movie in their home rather than going to a movie theature for watching a movie and spending their money. It can also happen that, the quality of movie has actually dropped and that's why the people who went for movies previously, they aer not going for watching movies in theature currently. If it proves true that the quality of the movies has actually dropped or the people who are giving the reviews they are do not have the realization of a high or low quality movies, then the author claims that their movie quality has increased and publick has lack of awarness does not hold water. The author must answer three important questions in order to bolster his argument that actually the quality of movie has increased and reaching out to public will actually increase the number of people for coming to the theature.

To conclude, although it is possible that the the author claims on the people having less awarness and positive reviews are increase, currently the argument is not in sound footing. The author need to answer three important questions and also need to provide evidences to bolster his argument that the despite having high quality of the movies the people are less aware and by advertising the people will come to movie theature more and more.

Votes
Average: 5 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-25 rubelmonir 16 view
2023-07-25 rubelmonir 60 view
2023-07-23 Mizanur_Rahman 50 view
2023-02-14 tedyang777 60 view
2022-11-13 barath002 58 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Mizanur_Rahman :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 113, Rule ID: WHOLE_LOT[1]
Message: Use simply 'bunch'.
Suggestion: bunch
...ovie theature are they representing the whole bunch of people of the society? Perhaps, the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 655, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...ality of movie has actually dropped and thats why the people who went for movies prev...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 890, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'done'.
Suggestion: done
...ple who are giving the reviews they are do not have the realization of a high or l...
^^
Line 5, column 43, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
... conclude, although it is possible that the the author claims on the people having less...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 43, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
... conclude, although it is possible that the the author claims on the people having less...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, really, so, still, then, while, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.6327345309 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 11.1786427146 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 13.6137724551 95% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 28.8173652695 101% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 55.5748502994 92% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 16.3942115768 73% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1981.0 2260.96107784 88% => OK
No of words: 417.0 441.139720559 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75059952038 5.12650576532 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.56307096286 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3310635407 2.78398813304 84% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 204.123752495 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.388489208633 0.468620217663 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 615.6 705.55239521 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.76447105788 103% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 19.7664670659 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 22.8473053892 162% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.4544525004 57.8364921388 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 180.090909091 119.503703932 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.9090909091 23.324526521 163% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 5.70786347227 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 5.15768463074 58% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227722942303 0.218282227539 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110663102667 0.0743258471296 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435529947625 0.0701772020484 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160366020059 0.128457276422 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334394065352 0.0628817314937 53% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.9 14.3799401198 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.38 48.3550499002 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.5 12.197005988 135% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.5979740519 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.32208582834 95% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 98.500998004 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 12.3882235529 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 11.1389221557 151% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.9071856287 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 5 2
No. of Sentences: 11 15
No. of Words: 417 350
No. of Characters: 1951 1500
No. of Different Words: 154 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.519 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.679 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.291 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 141 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 96 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 66 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 24 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 37.909 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.639 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.818 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.469 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.62 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.171 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 5