The scenerio presents that there is a downfall in the viewers of Super Screen produced movies. The author eloborates his view by giving some reasons; however, no statistics are given which could support the author reasoning. Firstly, author highlighted that there are few viewers, and there are less supportive reviews, or less type of reviews that can encourage other people to watch the movie, but the percentage of positive reviews had increased in the previous years. The solution presented by author is that to advertise about their movie in the coming year. The reason to the problem, and the solution at first sight seem to be persuasive. However, on scrutiny that author has presented flawed conclusion.
Firstly, the reason presented by author is not persuasive. As, there is a problem that less people are viewing the movie that indicates and questions the quality of the movie. It is possible that public had no interest in the movie and it is shown by their reviews. The positive reviews could be fake as well. A happy viewer would always gives a positive and supporting response. It is a posibility that there is something wrong with the content of movie rather than the public reviews.
Secondly, there is a possibilty that there can be more movie production houses open in that area. That new movie production houses would be offering more interested movies. There can be more publicity of other movie houses.
Moveover, by the time the people could have change and new generation or new people would be prefering other movie production houses rather than the super screen movie. So it is more preferable for Super Screen movie to change the content of the movie. New type of movies should be produced so that it would attract more people. There is a possibility that the language of the movie produced was not understable by the new people. So, subtitles can be included in the movie as well.
To sum up, the argument is flawed, and the conclusion cannot be accepted based on the reasoning and evidence provided.
- According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies a 25
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 63
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 50
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 50
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station.“Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the co 50
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: The scenerio presents that there is a downfall in the viewers of Super Screen produced movies.
Error: scenerio Suggestion: scenario
Sentence: The author eloborates his view by giving some reasons; however, no statistics are given which could support the author reasoning.
Error: eloborates Suggestion: elaborates
Sentence: It is a posibility that there is something wrong with the content of movie rather than the public reviews.
Error: posibility Suggestion: possibility
Sentence: Secondly, there is a possibilty that there can be more movie production houses open in that area.
Error: possibilty Suggestion: possibility
Sentence: Moveover, by the time the people could have change and new generation or new people would be prefering other movie production houses rather than the super screen movie.
Error: prefering Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: There is a possibility that the language of the movie produced was not understable by the new people.
Error: understable Suggestion: No alternate word
--------------------
argument 1 -- not OK
argument 2 -- not OK
argument 3 -- not OK
--------------------
samples:
https://www.testbig.com/gmatgre-argument-task-essays/following-taken-me…
--------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 6 2
No. of Sentences: 21 15
No. of Words: 345 350
No. of Characters: 1644 1500
No. of Different Words: 150 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.31 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.765 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.464 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 118 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 80 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 59 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 34 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.429 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.215 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.524 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.329 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.538 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.11 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...persuasive. As, there is a problem that less people are viewing the movie that indic...
^^^^
Line 3, column 339, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'give'
Suggestion: give
...ke as well. A happy viewer would always gives a positive and supporting response. It ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, well, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.6327345309 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.9520958084 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 11.1786427146 98% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 13.6137724551 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 28.8173652695 76% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 55.5748502994 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 16.3942115768 49% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1696.0 2260.96107784 75% => OK
No of words: 345.0 441.139720559 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91594202899 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.56307096286 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54303848545 2.78398813304 91% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 204.123752495 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.440579710145 0.468620217663 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 532.8 705.55239521 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.67365269461 299% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 19.7664670659 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.8473053892 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.3241001075 57.8364921388 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.7619047619 119.503703932 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4285714286 23.324526521 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.19047619048 5.70786347227 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.20758483034 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280230029524 0.218282227539 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0890782426924 0.0743258471296 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063504943322 0.0701772020484 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140906119362 0.128457276422 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0814542651492 0.0628817314937 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 14.3799401198 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.3550499002 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.197005988 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 12.5979740519 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.32208582834 93% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 98.500998004 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 12.3882235529 73% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.1389221557 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.