“The autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders; if the number of illegal immigrants entering a country cannot be checked, both its economy and national identity are endangered. Because economy and national identity are endangered."

Essay topics:

“The autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders; if the number of illegal immigrants entering a country cannot be checked, both its economy and national identity are endangered. Because economy and national identity are endangered."

The following assumption made in the argument is invalid and is rife with holes. Primarily, the argument is based upon the fact that there are many illegal immigrants entering our borders, but has failed to mentioned or give any ideas about the number of illegal immigrants entering by crossing a border.

The assumption made in the argument is rife with holes, as there are no data provided by the argument on number of illegal immigrants. The assumption has also failed, to mention the previous data about illegal immigrants, and according to that previous data, the situation is not alarming because the number of illegal immigrants who crosses the border, has plummeted down to very low numbers during the previous years. The argument would be strengthen, if they could have done any research on the numbers of illegal crossing through the borders.

More significantly, in this argument they have not considered the fact that, large number of illegal immigrants are the asylum seeker who has lost everything, from the war happening in their country. The argument would have strengthen if they could have provided us with the number of asylum seekers and illegal immigrants.

The assumption that illegal immigrant might be threat to our economy is worthless and without base, and has not mentioned the fact that the illegal immigrants are certain to work in a company or in an industry, boosting the economy and pay the taxes which might increase the revenues of the government.

So, in a nutshell, the argument has no considerable facts and data about the illegal immigrants and the assumptions made in the argument are invalid and does not account many things, which might affect a lot in the following assumption. More information and research is required in this topic, which might strengthen the argument presented above.

Votes
Average: 4.3 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-21 nikki1610 63 view
2019-11-27 Mat Pro 69 view
2019-11-12 bishal sitaula 59 view
2019-11-09 Roshan Dhakal 59 view
2019-10-06 man_si_jain 72 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Abhishek Chaudhary :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 420, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... low numbers during the previous years. The argument would be strengthen, if they c...
^^^
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'strengthened'.
Suggestion: strengthened
... their country. The argument would have strengthen if they could have provided us with the...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.6327345309 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 11.1786427146 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 28.8173652695 49% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 55.5748502994 72% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 16.3942115768 116% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 2260.96107784 68% => OK
No of words: 301.0 441.139720559 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09302325581 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.56307096286 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70760654646 2.78398813304 97% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 204.123752495 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.441860465116 0.468620217663 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 477.0 705.55239521 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.96107784431 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.76447105788 103% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 19.7664670659 51% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.8473053892 131% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.7172978344 57.8364921388 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.3 119.503703932 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1 23.324526521 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.3 5.70786347227 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 8.20758483034 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 6.88822355289 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151998663623 0.218282227539 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703746969889 0.0743258471296 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059194910362 0.0701772020484 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100348431233 0.128457276422 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515841207227 0.0628817314937 82% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 14.3799401198 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 48.3550499002 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.197005988 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.5979740519 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.32208582834 100% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 98.500998004 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 12.3882235529 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.1389221557 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 2.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 15
No. of Words: 301 350
No. of Characters: 1498 1500
No. of Different Words: 124 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.165 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.977 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.62 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 109 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 93 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 64 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 36 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 30.1 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 12.373 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.496 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.746 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.185 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5