The speaker asserts that imagination is a more valuable asset than experience. In my view the speaker unfairly generalizes. As we exam different fields of inquiry, we shall see that in some area, especially in arts, imagination often have a more significant role than other characters such as experience. However, in some other fields, particularly in physics and math, scientific progress relies on the experience of those brilliant scientists. In still other fields, such as business and engineering, both imagination and experience are required for excellent achievements. Therefore, I believe that the view of the speaker is inaccurate.
An artist would need his or her talent of imagination to create distinguished artwork. In the process of generating artistic works, artists could not come to a great breakthrough without imagination beyond the worldly life. It is possible that abundant experience could be fundamental to drawing a picture or sculpturing. But if an artist could not imagine about art itself, even though he or she has abundant experience, this so-called artist is nothing more than a copier, would not have enough ability to create his or her own miracle. Only when a skilled artist has sufficient imagination, great works of art could be finished. Therefore, I believe in the art world, imagination is more valuable than experience.
However, on the contrary, in the natural science world of physics and math, experience would hold a more important status than imagination. Every scientific deduction must be fully based on careful observation and precise statistic data. A scientist with ample experiences in research, even though he or she is not very creative, could apply elaborate experiments, collect detailed experiment data, infer possible theories responsively and come to a reasonable conclusion eventually. Imagination could be helpful in scientific research especially when research meet its bottleneck, but a scientist who imagines a lot but has little experience, maybe carry on research with errors and irresponsible conclusions. In short, I take experience for a superordinate character of scientists compared with imagination.
In the fields of business and engineering, imagination and experience are both significant. Without imagination, one could not make difference; without experience, one could not transform his or her imagination into reality. Only those people whose imagination and imagination are both abundant would have possibilities to success in these fields.
In sum, in some fields such as art, imagination is a more valuable asset than experience, while in some other fields, experience is more important, or they are equally significant. Obviously people could benefit from both experience and experience as long as they enter into suitable fields. Therefore, people should take different attitudes toward these two traits when facing different situations.
- Claim Imagination is a more valuable asset than experience Reason People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible without the constraints of established habits and attitudes Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you a 85
- Claim: Imagination is a more valuable asset than experience.Reason: People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible without the constraints of established habits and attitudes.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you a 50
- Workers in the small town of Leeville take fewer sick days than workers in the large city of Masonton, 50 miles away. Moreover, relative to population size, the diagnosis of stress-related illness is proportionally much lower in Leeville than in Masonton. 58
- Ten years ago,as part of a comprehensive urban renewal program,the city of Transopolis adapted for industrial use a large area of severely substandard housing near the freeway.Subsequently,several factories were constructed there,crime rates in the area d 66
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of marketing at Dura-Sock, Inc."A recent study of our customers suggests that our company is wasting the money it spends on its patented Endure manufacturing process, which ensures that our socks ar 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, while, in short, such as, in my view, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.6327345309 81% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.9520958084 131% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 11.1786427146 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 28.8173652695 104% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 55.5748502994 86% => OK
Nominalization: 37.0 16.3942115768 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2490.0 2260.96107784 110% => OK
No of words: 444.0 441.139720559 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60810810811 5.12650576532 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.56307096286 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18745180955 2.78398813304 114% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 204.123752495 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486486486486 0.468620217663 104% => OK
syllable_count: 795.6 705.55239521 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59920159681 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.471057884232 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.22255489022 284% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 19.7664670659 116% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.2105258556 57.8364921388 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.260869565 119.503703932 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3043478261 23.324526521 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26086956522 5.70786347227 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.20758483034 171% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.67664670659 128% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249984377319 0.218282227539 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0818287433614 0.0743258471296 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703717815133 0.0701772020484 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153904019483 0.128457276422 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223978199391 0.0628817314937 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.3799401198 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 48.3550499002 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.197005988 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.5979740519 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.32208582834 100% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 98.500998004 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 12.3882235529 73% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.