The following appeared in a letter from the owner of the Sunnyside Towers apartment building to its manager.
"One month ago, all the showerheads on the first five floors of Sunnyside Towers were modified to restrict the water flow to approximately 1/3 of its original force. Although actual readings of water usage before and after the adjustment are not yet available, the change will obviously result in a considerable savings for Sunnyside Corporation, since the corporation must pay for water each month. Except for a few complaints about low water pressure, no problems with showers have been reported since the adjustment. Clearly, restricting water flow throughout all the 20 floors of Sunnyside Towers will increase our profits further."
Letter recommends that restriction on water flow on all flloor will able to save money for sunnyside towers. To support this recommendation, author points to low number of water complaints generated by floor which have participated in reducing water flow. In addition to that, author tries to justify restriction of water flow on all floor by relating it to increase in profit. The conclusion made by author seems prudent and judicious at first glance, but it problematic in several critical respects.
first, author doesn't compare impact of restriction on first five floor to other floors. it might possible that first five floor have high water flow due to gravity which justifies restriction on its original waterflow. but higher flows might not have sufficiently high water flow. By restricting 1/3 of water flow on higher flow might result into low water pressure.
In addition to that, author fails to recognize nature of complaints. it might possible that complaints were made during specific hours like early morning when everybody on floor are using water supply. if this is case, then it seriously undermine author view on number of complaints. because only few people migth have experienced issues out of all. So, if we carry out restricting on all floor, then number of complaints might increase because of that.
In conclusion, The recommendation is unconvincing as it stands. To strengthen it, the author must provide clear evidence that. To better evaluate the argument, this need to be addressed more.
- The following appeared in a letter from the owner of the Sunnyside Towers apartment building to its manager."One month ago, all the showerheads on the first five floors of Sunnyside Towers were modified to restrict the water flow to approximately 1/3 33
- Educators should teach facts only after their students have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts. 50
- People's attitudes are determined more by their immediate situation or surroundings than by society as awhole.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement andexplain your reasoning for the positio 50
- Governments should invest as much in the arts as they do in the military. 50
- Some people believe that competition drives young athletes to perform at their best, while others believethat competition discourages those who are not athletically talented from participating in organized sports. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...tic in several critical respects. first, author doesnt compare impact of restri...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 15, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... critical respects. first, author doesnt compare impact of restriction on first ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 89, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...on on first five floor to other floors. it might possible that first five floor ha...
^^
Line 5, column 220, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
... restriction on its original waterflow. but higher flows might not have sufficientl...
^^^
Line 9, column 70, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ails to recognize nature of complaints. it might possible that complaints were mad...
^^
Line 9, column 203, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...rybody on floor are using water supply. if this is case, then it seriously undermi...
^^
Line 9, column 238, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'undermines'?
Suggestion: undermines
...ply. if this is case, then it seriously undermine author view on number of complaints. be...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 285, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
...ne author view on number of complaints. because only few people migth have experienced ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 285, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ne author view on number of complaints. because only few people migth have experienced ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 367, Rule ID: CONFUSION_OF_OUR_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'our'?
Suggestion: our
...nced issues out of all. So, if we carry out restricting on all floor, then number o...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, then, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 19.6327345309 25% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 11.1786427146 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 28.8173652695 66% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 55.5748502994 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 16.3942115768 61% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1290.0 2260.96107784 57% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 246.0 441.139720559 56% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24390243902 5.12650576532 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.56307096286 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78849048039 2.78398813304 100% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 204.123752495 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560975609756 0.468620217663 120% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 705.55239521 54% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.22255489022 166% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 19.7664670659 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 22.8473053892 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.5913421117 57.8364921388 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.625 119.503703932 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.375 23.324526521 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.70786347227 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 10.0 5.25449101796 190% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227235531989 0.218282227539 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0777238894483 0.0743258471296 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669493347077 0.0701772020484 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130303103737 0.128457276422 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.084628707191 0.0628817314937 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.3799401198 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.3550499002 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.197005988 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.52 12.5979740519 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.32208582834 92% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 98.500998004 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.1389221557 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.9071856287 67% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.