The following is a petition to the city council of Centerville Over the past three years there has been a marked increase in cases of sidewalk rage similar to the irrational anger drivers experience on the road but instead among sidewalk walkers The resul

The author suggests that the council of Centerville must ban cell phone use on sidewalks. The claim is that the use of cell phones by pedestrians is the cause of 'sidewalk rage' which has resulted in an increase in assaults, property damage, and disruptions of normal pedestrian traffic. There are many flaws with this line of reasoning and I will discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument.

Firstly, the assumption is that the main reason for the marked increase in cases of 'sidewalk rage' are due to pedestrians using their cell phones while walking. This doesn't provide any specific evidence as to why this is the main cause of the issue. In addition, we are not sure if the spike in irrational anger among sidewalk walkers is due to reasons other than cell phone use. It could be that pedestrians are enraged because they almost got hit by drivers when crossing a sidewalk. If cell phones are banned and the issue remains unresolved, this will weaken the argument.

Secondly, the author assumes that using a cell phone will slow down pedestrian traffic and increases the likelihood of people bumping into one another. While this could hold some merit in busy cities like New York, we have no idea how busy the sidewalks are in Centerville. However, the author states that Middletown has had a significant decrease of incidents of sidewalk crime and hasn't had any complaints. Just because this ban worked in Middletown doesn't mean it will work in Centerville. For all we know, Centerville could be in a rural area and Middleville could be in an uban area.

Thirdly, the passage mentions that Children are especially vulnerable because they are too short to be easily seen. This assumption doesn't specify exactly what the children would be vulnerable to.

In conclusion, the argument could be strengthened by providing specific evidence as to how cell phone uses are linked to the increase in sidewalk crime.

Votes
Average: 5 (2 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...g their cell phones while walking. This doesnt provide any specific evidence as to why...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 384, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hasn't
...ease of incidents of sidewalk crime and hasnt had any complaints. Just because this b...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 453, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...t because this ban worked in Middletown doesnt mean it will work in Centerville. For a...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 133, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...hort to be easily seen. This assumption doesnt specify exactly what the children would...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, while, as to, in addition, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.6327345309 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.9520958084 85% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 28.8173652695 80% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 55.5748502994 72% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 16.3942115768 55% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 2260.96107784 72% => OK
No of words: 327.0 441.139720559 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94495412844 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64544200466 2.78398813304 95% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 204.123752495 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529051987768 0.468620217663 113% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 705.55239521 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 19.7664670659 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.790328718 57.8364921388 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.0625 119.503703932 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4375 23.324526521 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0625 5.70786347227 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.20758483034 24% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 6.88822355289 160% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145159421274 0.218282227539 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505190732137 0.0743258471296 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538504107463 0.0701772020484 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0812353792751 0.128457276422 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053970195223 0.0628817314937 86% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.3799401198 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.3550499002 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.5979740519 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.32208582834 101% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 98.500998004 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 12.3882235529 73% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...g their cell phones while walking. This doesnt provide any specific evidence as to why...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 384, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hasn't
...ease of incidents of sidewalk crime and hasnt had any complaints. Just because this b...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 453, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...t because this ban worked in Middletown doesnt mean it will work in Centerville. For a...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 133, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...hort to be easily seen. This assumption doesnt specify exactly what the children would...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, while, as to, in addition, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.6327345309 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.9520958084 85% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 28.8173652695 80% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 55.5748502994 72% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 16.3942115768 55% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 2260.96107784 72% => OK
No of words: 327.0 441.139720559 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94495412844 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64544200466 2.78398813304 95% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 204.123752495 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529051987768 0.468620217663 113% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 705.55239521 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 19.7664670659 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.790328718 57.8364921388 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.0625 119.503703932 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4375 23.324526521 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0625 5.70786347227 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.20758483034 24% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 6.88822355289 160% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145159421274 0.218282227539 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505190732137 0.0743258471296 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538504107463 0.0701772020484 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0812353792751 0.128457276422 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053970195223 0.0628817314937 86% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.3799401198 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.3550499002 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.5979740519 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.32208582834 101% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 98.500998004 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 12.3882235529 73% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.