The following is from a recent email from the Diord Corp. Human Resources Manager:
“Tobor Technologies found that mental health problems and mental illness were responsible for about 15 percent of employee sick days. Tobor amended its employee insurance plan so that workers receive the same coverage for mental illness as they do for physical illness. In addition, the company hired an on-site psychologist and created a system that allows workers to schedule confidential counseling appointments. After one year, the number of sick days used by employees declined by 10 percent. Diord Corp. has had an increase in employee sick days over the past two years, so we should introduce a similar insurance plan and counseling program. These measures will surely reduce employee absenteeism and cause an increase in productivity.”
Write a response in which you examine the argument’s unstated assumptions, making sure to explain how the argument depends on the assumptions and what the implications are if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
In the email sent by the Diord Corporation Human Resource Manager, a conclusion has been drawn that Diord Corp. should follow in the footsteps of measures taken by Tobor Technologies to make an insurance plan and counselling program to aid the mental health of its workers, to decrease the number of sick days taken. This conclusion is built on the premise that this technique has clearly worked at Tobor, with statistics to substantiate the evidence of the method’s efficacy. However, there are three main unstated assumptions that have been made by the Manager that lead to the argument being weak. Addressing these three assumptions would strengthen the argument made.
First, the argument assumes that the conditions at Tobor are identical to that of Diord. It inadvertently claims that mental health problems are the reason for the sick days being taken by employees at Diord, and never provides evidence for this. It may be possible that the cause of Diord’s increase in sick days over the past two years is the result of other factors, such as inadequate cleaning of the office, a toxic work environment, or external factors like family issues. The locations of Diord’s offices could be possibly unfavourable for employees’ good health. The manager must refute these possibilities to cement his argument, since any evidence that may arise in favour of Diord’s sick days not being a result of poor mental health, would simply break down the argument.
Second, the argument makes the assumption that the number of sick days at Diord Corp. is high enough to warrant such measures. In other words, it assumes that the number of sick days taken by employees is significant enough to impede the company’s productivity. Although it claims that the measures taken will help to increase productivity, there is no logical basis for the same. What if the average number of sick days taken by the employees at Diord increased in the over the past two years by a small factor, going from, say, 5 days per year to 6 days per year? Such a negligible increase may not be ‘addressed’ by the counselling and insurance programs. If the assumption that the increase is sufficient proves unwarranted, then it would falsify the logic of the argument.
Finally, the argument does not consider other ways to reduce sick days at Diord. Let us assume that the previous two assumptions are warranted; Diord employees face mental health problems and are taking more and more sick days each year due to this reason. Then does that necessarily mean that the measures taken by Tobor would also work at Diord? Not necessarily. It may be the case that Diord employees prefer other modes of solving mental issues, like personal therapy sessions, or meditation and mindfulness. There is not enough evidence to prove that a new insurance plan and counselling program would get rid of the difficulties faced by the employees, and the manager does not provide any evidence of the employees wanting or requiring such a program. The human resources department at Diord should, in this case, consider taking a comprehensive survey of Diord’s employees, asking them about why they take sick days, and what health/other issues are leading them to take more sick days. If the survey displays that the manager’s assumption is unwarranted, then it significantly reduces the viability of the proposed measures. The argument would fall apart, and other avenues must be explored.
In conclusion, the argument, as it stands now, makes multiple unstated assumptions, and does not provide substantiative evidence to bolster its logic. These lapses in logic may end up costing the company a lot of money and resources that could have gone to a better purpose, in case the assumptions made by the manager prove unwarranted. If a well-rounded survey of the employees is done, with concrete evidence in favour of certain measures to be taken, then the argument could be better crafted to not be as shaky. Hence, the argument’s reliance on the aforementioned unstated assumptions may lead to a waste of resources if they are proven unwarranted.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-03 | HARSHITH LN | 60 | view |
| 2023-07-04 | Technoblade | 58 | view |
| 2022-11-12 | Swarnali Swarno | 64 | view |
| 2022-10-15 | srilakshmip05 | 50 | view |
| 2022-04-13 | jetb34632 | 50 | view |
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a local newspaper in Masontown If we want to save money on municipal garbage disposal fees we need to encourage our residents to recycle more Late last year our neighboring town Hayesworth passed a law r 68
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary Write a response in which you discuss 70
- An international development organization in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A While seeds for this new type of millet cost more farmers will be paid 58
- Claim The best test of an argument is its ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint Reason Only by being forced to defend an idea against the doubts and contrasting views of others does one really discover the value of that idea Write a respo 66
- The following appeared in a newsletter offering advice to investors Techcorporation is our top pick for investment this term We urge all of our clients to invest in this new company For the first time in ten years a company that has developed satellite te 58
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 9 2
No. of Sentences: 28 15
No. of Words: 681 350
No. of Characters: 3342 1500
No. of Different Words: 270 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 5.108 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.907 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.669 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 226 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 170 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 130 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 75 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.321 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.514 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.607 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.315 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.479 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.1 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 770, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
... or requiring such a program. The human resources department at Diord should, in this cas...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, hence, however, if, may, second, so, then, well, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.6327345309 148% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.9520958084 154% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 11.1786427146 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 13.6137724551 147% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 28.8173652695 153% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 89.0 55.5748502994 160% => OK
Nominalization: 29.0 16.3942115768 177% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3451.0 2260.96107784 153% => OK
No of words: 680.0 441.139720559 154% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.075 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.10654576214 4.56307096286 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8308693659 2.78398813304 102% => OK
Unique words: 290.0 204.123752495 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.426470588235 0.468620217663 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1042.2 705.55239521 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.76447105788 126% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.70958083832 221% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 1.67365269461 418% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.22255489022 237% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 19.7664670659 147% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.8473053892 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5773971856 57.8364921388 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 119.503703932 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4482758621 23.324526521 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75862068966 5.70786347227 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 18.0 6.88822355289 261% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277985916503 0.218282227539 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0741558272579 0.0743258471296 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066132602018 0.0701772020484 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167221666828 0.128457276422 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0655585004802 0.0628817314937 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.3799401198 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.3550499002 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.5979740519 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.32208582834 99% => OK
difficult_words: 150.0 98.500998004 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.1389221557 101% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.