An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p

The argument/organisation concludes that Tagus government should work on all possible ways to implement suggested --farming the new variety of millet for Vitamin A-- solution in order to improve Vitamin level in Tegus people. The evidence cited are subsidy, staple food and government force to implement changes. However the premises are unable to substantiate the weak argument. the main reason why argument remains inconclusive are fallacious assumptions, oblivion to other important factors and incorrect statistics/data.

Firstly, The incorrectly assumes that farmer will get subsidy if they plant millet given that Tegus is already a poor country. This decision was made by Organisation itself which holds no ground. any such decision comes from gov body. Further more, it is possible that country is unable pay its bad load and might be bad financial situation. Moreover, Organisation has said they have developed new seed for Vitamin A source but failed to provide statistic of that this will be beneficial for both people of Tegus and its government. by seeing this one can simply object Organisation's motive, may be they are just testing their product by persuading with tricks and fallacious assumption.

Secondly, Organisation has failed to consider other important factors that can affect the outcome of this argument in different way. why organisation did not think about other sources if Vitamin A sources, may be there are more Vitamin A sources which are cheaper. Furthermore, Organisation has not considered Tegus environmental situation. there can be other so sources which a give more Vitamin A and more Tegus environment friendly. Hence, Argument remains oblivion to many important factors.

Finally, The Organisation's report that government should do more to enforce their decision to improve output of millet farming. may be government is doing their best they don't have best resources, technology, environmental conditions for millet. in this case why organisation is considering other options like international fund for Vitamin a source import from other countries.

In conclusion, Organisation should answer these crucial question before purposing/suggesting any change to Tegus gov.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 314, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... government force to implement changes. However the premises are unable to substantiate...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 381, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...able to substantiate the weak argument. the main reason why argument remains inconc...
^^^
Line 3, column 197, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Any
...anisation itself which holds no ground. any such decision comes from gov body. Furt...
^^^
Line 3, column 534, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: By
...oth people of Tegus and its government. by seeing this one can simply object Organ...
^^
Line 3, column 593, Rule ID: MAY_BE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'maybe' (=perhaps)?
Suggestion: maybe
...can simply object Organisations motive, may be they are just testing their product by ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ith tricks and fallacious assumption. Secondly, Organisation has failed to con...
^^^
Line 5, column 134, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Why
...come of this argument in different way. why organisation did not think about other ...
^^^
Line 5, column 196, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'A source' or simply 'sources'?
Suggestion: A source; Sources
...ot think about other sources if Vitamin A sources, may be there are more Vitamin A source...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 237, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'A source' or simply 'sources'?
Suggestion: A source; Sources
... sources, may be there are more Vitamin A sources which are cheaper. Furthermore, Organis...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 342, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...nsidered Tegus environmental situation. there can be other so sources which a give mo...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 497, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ins oblivion to many important factors. Finally, The Organisations report that g...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 129, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: May
...on to improve output of millet farming. may be government is doing their best they ...
^^^
Line 7, column 172, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... be government is doing their best they dont have best resources, technology, enviro...
^^^^
Line 7, column 177, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'have the best'.
Suggestion: have the best
...overnment is doing their best they dont have best resources, technology, environmental co...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 247, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...y, environmental conditions for millet. in this case why organisation is consideri...
^^

Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'finally', 'first', 'firstly', 'furthermore', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'in conclusion']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.291105121294 0.25644967241 114% => OK
Verbs: 0.167115902965 0.15541462614 108% => OK
Adjectives: 0.11590296496 0.0836205057962 139% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0404312668464 0.0520304965353 78% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0296495956873 0.0272364105082 109% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0862533692722 0.125424944231 69% => OK
Participles: 0.0350404312668 0.0416121511921 84% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.1700606141 2.79052419416 114% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0296495956873 0.026700313972 111% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0646900269542 0.113004496875 57% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0323450134771 0.0255425247493 127% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0215633423181 0.0127820249294 169% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2222.0 2731.13054187 81% => OK
No of words: 336.0 446.07635468 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.6130952381 6.12365571057 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.57801047555 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.428571428571 0.378187486979 113% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.342261904762 0.287650121315 119% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.241071428571 0.208842608468 115% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.169642857143 0.135150697306 126% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1700606141 2.79052419416 114% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 207.018472906 92% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565476190476 0.469332199767 120% => OK
Word variations: 62.220456813 52.1807786196 119% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.039408867 95% => OK
Sentence length: 17.6842105263 23.2022227129 76% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.622268145 57.7814097925 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.947368421 141.986410481 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6842105263 23.2022227129 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.736842105263 0.724660767414 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 15.0 3.58251231527 419% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 51.9104010025 51.9672348444 100% => OK
Elegance: 1.73863636364 1.8405768891 94% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29531602621 0.441005458295 67% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0754887467792 0.135418324435 56% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0532794412346 0.0829849096947 64% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.484157228899 0.58762219726 82% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.173570148432 0.147661913831 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.089987225857 0.193483328276 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878613909121 0.0970749176394 91% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.161319575968 0.42659136922 38% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0470258274299 0.0774707102158 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170761226276 0.312017818177 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562468552832 0.0698173142475 81% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.33743842365 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.87684729064 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.82512315271 104% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 6.46551724138 46% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 5.36822660099 75% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.82389162562 71% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 14.657635468 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.