The argument that innoculations against cow flu need not necessarly to be monitored. The auther , Hoever mentioned that if innoculations were monitored meticulously we could have save more lives, says that there is very samll probability that person who is infacted from this diease would die. The evidence cited to support this argument is less chances that person would die as result of innoculation. Hoever these premises are unable to substantiate the weak argument.
The main reason why the argument is rendered inconclusive are fallacious assumptions, ignoring other important factors and incorrect survey/statistic information.
Firstly, Author probably doen't about - precaution is better that cure. author incorrectly assumes that many lifes could have be save if innoculations were adminstered meticulously. he has not provided any evidence to substantiate this. how many hospitals are there which are following correct and std procedure ? may be all are following correct procedure but innoculation has not effact or slow effact on flu ? innoculation might be unable to work well to fight flu ? Hence, argument is based on incorrect assumptions.
Secondly, author fails to consider other important factors which may chage the outcome of the arguement in different direction.Author fails to consider other factors like death rate, symtomps ? how author came to know that there will be less chances of dying from flu so we should not monitor or stop ? Author ignore many cardinal affacting factors thus argument is weak and inconclusive.
Finally, author concludes this argument based outcome of one perticular area which is full of fundamental loopholes. Hence, Author should answer these questions before implementing or taking any such dangerous step.
In conclusion, Author should work sedulously and come up with exact report like flu areas, location, deaths, flu causes, and other proactive measurement which are currently in place. Implmenting or thinking about any such nascent or careless step author has work more on gathering more relevant and pertinent information which can sunstantiate his argument.
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 50
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the po 58
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary. 50
- "Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas in which the disease is detected.However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations,we cannot perm 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...t necessarly to be monitored. The auther , Hoever mentioned that if innoculations...
^^
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d. The auther , Hoever mentioned that if innoculations were monitored meticulousl...
^^
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'saved'.
Suggestion: saved
...re monitored meticulously we could have save more lives, says that there is very sam...
^^^^
Line 1, column 296, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...is infacted from this diease would die. The evidence cited to support this argument...
^^^
Line 4, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...urvey/statistic information. Firstly, Author probably doent about - precaution...
^^
Line 4, column 73, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Author
...about - precaution is better that cure. author incorrectly assumes that many lifes cou...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 127, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...ctly assumes that many lifes could have be save if innoculations were adminstered ...
^^
Line 4, column 183, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...ulations were adminstered meticulously. he has not provided any evidence to substa...
^^
Line 4, column 238, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: How
...ided any evidence to substantiate this. how many hospitals are there which are foll...
^^^
Line 4, column 315, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: May
...e following correct and std procedure ? may be all are following correct procedure ...
^^^
Line 4, column 414, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Innoculation
... has not effact or slow effact on flu ? innoculation might be unable to work well to fight f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 522, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ment is based on incorrect assumptions. Secondly, author fails to consider othe...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on incorrect assumptions. Secondly, author fails to consider other important...
^^
Line 6, column 129, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Author
...of the arguement in different direction.Author fails to consider other factors like de...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 196, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: How
...her factors like death rate, symtomps ? how author came to know that there will be ...
^^^
Line 6, column 239, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun chances is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... author came to know that there will be less chances of dying from flu so we should ...
^^^^
Line 6, column 320, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun cardinal seems to be countable; consider using: 'many cardinals'.
Suggestion: many cardinals
...ld not monitor or stop ? Author ignore many cardinal affacting factors thus argument is weak...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t is weak and inconclusive. Finally, author concludes this argument based out...
^^
Line 8, column 58, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...concludes this argument based outcome of one perticular area which is full of fun...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'finally', 'first', 'firstly', 'hence', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'thus', 'well', 'in conclusion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.230985915493 0.25644967241 90% => OK
Verbs: 0.208450704225 0.15541462614 134% => OK
Adjectives: 0.118309859155 0.0836205057962 141% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0647887323944 0.0520304965353 125% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0112676056338 0.0272364105082 41% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0901408450704 0.125424944231 72% => OK
Participles: 0.0591549295775 0.0416121511921 142% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.04904724443 2.79052419416 109% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0253521126761 0.026700313972 95% => OK
Particles: 0.00281690140845 0.001811407834 156% => OK
Determiners: 0.0507042253521 0.113004496875 45% => Some determiners wanted.
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0338028169014 0.0255425247493 132% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0253521126761 0.0127820249294 198% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2140.0 2731.13054187 78% => OK
No of words: 328.0 446.07635468 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.5243902439 6.12365571057 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.57801047555 93% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.408536585366 0.378187486979 108% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.301829268293 0.287650121315 105% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.25 0.208842608468 120% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.17987804878 0.135150697306 133% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04904724443 2.79052419416 109% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 207.018472906 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564024390244 0.469332199767 120% => OK
Word variations: 61.4532072631 52.1807786196 118% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.039408867 95% => OK
Sentence length: 17.2631578947 23.2022227129 74% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5579871529 57.7814097925 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.631578947 141.986410481 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2631578947 23.2022227129 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.684210526316 0.724660767414 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.14285714286 117% => OK
Language errors: 19.0 3.58251231527 530% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 47.446084724 51.9672348444 91% => OK
Elegance: 1.33663366337 1.8405768891 73% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298825291957 0.441005458295 68% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0902656777159 0.135418324435 67% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0872705320462 0.0829849096947 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.510017872811 0.58762219726 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.189176363087 0.147661913831 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0972844664289 0.193483328276 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627183743709 0.0970749176394 65% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.159963142873 0.42659136922 37% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0396151971564 0.0774707102158 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150050685125 0.312017818177 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0831874869689 0.0698173142475 119% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.33743842365 36% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 6.87684729064 204% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.82512315271 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 6.46551724138 31% => OK
Negative topic words: 12.0 5.36822660099 224% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.82389162562 35% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 14.657635468 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.