Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permit inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered.
It is overly simplistic to argue that cow flu will kill people based on the reason sighted in the prompt. Vaccines have saved the livs of many people. The Black death that plagues Europe in the medieval ages remains in our memory till date. Vaccines saved the lives of children born thereafter when it was later discovered that it is the rats that acts as disease vectors. Thereafter, Scientist such as Alexander Fleming and Robert Koch postulated that we can develop vaccines from microorganisms that causes such diseases.
Furthermore, cow flu is a viral disease that can run its course without treatment. Most viral diseases are self limiting. There is always a need for vaccine to be administered routinely. This is because they stimualte the body to produce antibodies that can last several years depending on their type, active or passive. For example, the tetanus vaccine can last for ten years, especially the attenuated vaccines. Hence, it will be diabolical of an individual to assume that vaccines kill people. At least, Katerine would not be alive to see the day that her daughter will be given that cow flu vaccine had it been that her own parents disbelieved in this fact.
Moreover, vaccines can improve the wealth of a nation. For example, African countries receives billions of dollars in aids and grants to administer free vaccines to their people. This is cogent to the point earlier said that vaccines save lives. Had it been that they rejected the grants, mass deaths would have been recorded in countries like Djibouti and Lesotho. This of course, will lead to mass protest, the like of Arab Spring that raised her ugly head in 2011. Hence, countries should not agree to the notion that vaccines can cause death. It is just a possibility, only in exceptional cases.
In addition, vacinnes can boost the immunity level of children and adults alike. It prevents polio, tetanus, mad cow disease e.t.c. Countries like Nigeria and Pakistan are perfects example to foment this point. Nigeria being Africa's most populous country, have a life expentancy of less than 100 according to reliable sources such as World Health Organisation. Polio cases ravage the poor Northeast too. Had it been the Northern elders accepted the vaccine earlier proposed by the whitemen, they would have been saved from this today.
In conclusion, We can permit inoculatiuons of cow flu to be routinely admistered
- We venerate loyalty to our schools employers institutions friends as a virtue Loyalty however can be at least as detrimental an influence as it can be a beneficial one 50
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permi 26
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary. 16
- A nation should require all of its student to study the same national curriculum until they proceed to college 50
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Out of topic.
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ?? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 25 15
No. of Words: 402 350
No. of Characters: 1957 1500
No. of Different Words: 227 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.478 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.868 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.48 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 138 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 106 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 71 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 35 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.08 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.183 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.48 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.257 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.452 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.064 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, at least, for example, in addition, in conclusion, of course, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.6327345309 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.9520958084 131% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 13.6137724551 125% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 28.8173652695 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 55.5748502994 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 16.3942115768 18% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2025.0 2260.96107784 90% => OK
No of words: 401.0 441.139720559 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04987531172 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.56307096286 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56873592235 2.78398813304 92% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 204.123752495 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571072319202 0.468620217663 122% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 705.55239521 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.96107784431 181% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 19.7664670659 126% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.8473053892 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.0176845452 57.8364921388 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.0 119.503703932 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.04 23.324526521 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28 5.70786347227 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.20758483034 122% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 6.88822355289 131% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.67664670659 128% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138445067292 0.218282227539 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0413098728298 0.0743258471296 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457176228585 0.0701772020484 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.09781131197 0.128457276422 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543631506896 0.0628817314937 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 14.3799401198 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.3550499002 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.197005988 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.5979740519 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.32208582834 107% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 98.500998004 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.1389221557 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.