Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permit inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered.
Above argument states that they can not permit inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered on the basis of few vague points. It totally seems to be uncertain so I am sceptical about this argument. Further I explained Why I am sceptical.
Firstly, They said that many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. This statement arises some questions like Many People might be saved means What value of many we have to consider 10, 100 or 1000? Exactly How many people died till then compared to infected count of pepole? How many areas in which it was detected compared total areas? Does it have characteristics of spreading quickly like pandemic COVID-19 have. It was not administered routinely then at how much gap it was administered.
Further, They said that there was small probability that a person will die as a result of inoculations. This is totally vague. How much small probabiliy it is? How many total lives can be die compare to population? If it is not causing death then, Is there any serious problem it is causing like disabilities or anything. How can they consider that small amount of person lives not matter. Is there any side effect or any problem with inoculation? Or if it is then how serious it is comapre to deaths of that small amount amount of people lives. If there is small probability of death then what is happening with others patient. They never said that they are becoming well. There might be chances that they will face serious problems. For example, We can see that in many road accidents people are not met with death but they sometimes met with lifelong disability or desease which can not be cured like brain injuries. Other one is TB in this there is same thing people not met with death but they suffer whole life.
On the other hand there might be chances that they are not permiting because may be there would be some side effect of inoculation against cow flu to be routinely administered. But as all statemetns even this thing is not stated in the argument.
Going through whole argument and all posibilities This argument is definitely vague as there is no proper statistics, data or record. I remained unconvinced. They should provide some data, statistics and proper detail about cow flue, cases, inoculations and every aspect which is related to this cow flue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-29 | dkim1206 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | wcfr | 60 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | riyarmy | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | Nowshin Tabassum | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | Mizanur_Rahman | 55 | view |
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations we cannot permit i 70
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 83
- Sports stars and movie stars have an obligation to behave as role models for the young people who look up to them In return for the millions of dollars that they are paid we should expect them to fulfill this societal responsibility 58
- Claim An action is morally correct if the amount of good that results from the action is greater than the amount of bad that results from the action Reason When assessing the morality of an action the results of an action are more important than the inten 50
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers 50
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 27 15
No. of Words: 418 350
No. of Characters: 1956 1500
No. of Different Words: 190 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.522 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.679 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.555 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 118 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 88 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 59 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 39 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 15.481 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.81 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.481 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.26 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.395 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.081 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 515, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: amount
...s it is comapre to deaths of that small amount amount of people lives. If there is small prob...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 546, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...at small amount amount of people lives. If there is small probability of death the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, so, then, well, for example, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 36.0 19.6327345309 183% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.9520958084 108% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 11.1786427146 107% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 13.6137724551 103% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 28.8173652695 153% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 55.5748502994 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 16.3942115768 55% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2006.0 2260.96107784 89% => OK
No of words: 418.0 441.139720559 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7990430622 5.12650576532 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.56307096286 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6389717819 2.78398813304 95% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 204.123752495 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.456937799043 0.468620217663 98% => OK
syllable_count: 640.8 705.55239521 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 4.96107784431 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 8.76447105788 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 19.7664670659 137% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.8473053892 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.8566379683 57.8364921388 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.2962962963 119.503703932 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4814814815 23.324526521 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2962962963 5.70786347227 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 17.0 6.88822355289 247% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356748971048 0.218282227539 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0898894404021 0.0743258471296 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112668066493 0.0701772020484 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199161711808 0.128457276422 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0967230115786 0.0628817314937 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 14.3799401198 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 48.3550499002 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 12.197005988 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 12.5979740519 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.32208582834 91% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 98.500998004 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 12.3882235529 69% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.1389221557 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.9071856287 67% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.