Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permit inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered.
The author concludes that routinely administered inoculations against cow flue can not be permitted to infected peoples. There is paucity of some evidences in author's assumptions.
Firstly, the severity and intesity of the disease is not mentioned in the passage that how many people get infected and die with the disease. In addition, the nature and epidemiology of the disease are also not described there in the passage.
Secondly, author is not sure about the panacea of the inoculations against the disease. The fucntion and working modality of the inoculation is also not pellucidly mentioned in the passage. There is no supportive evidence for the lethal action of inoculation like how many people might die because of the side-effects of inoculants ?
Thirdly, there might be other medical therapies, medicines or vaccines for counteracting the side-effects of inoculants. The author is unkown about this. Furthermore, the disease may disseminate from one place to other so rapidly that inoculation made to people of particular area may not work.
Thus, it is necessary to study more and consider above mentioned evidences for rejections of the inoculation against cow flu disease.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-29 | dkim1206 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | wcfr | 60 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | riyarmy | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | Nowshin Tabassum | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | Mizanur_Rahman | 55 | view |
- Is an amusement park better to construct in the city to attract tourists 66
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 50
- Air purifier 76
- Claim The emergence of the online blogosphere has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States Reason When anyone can publish political opinions easily standards for covering news and political topics will inevitably decl 66
- We recommend that Grove College preserve its century old tradition of all female education rather than admit men into its programs It is true that a majority of faculty members voted in favor of coeducation arguing that it would encourage more students to 57
Comments
e-rater score report
No. of Words: 187 350
Minimum 250 words wanted
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 8 2
No. of Sentences: 11 15
No. of Words: 187 350
No. of Characters: 981 1500
No. of Different Words: 99 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.698 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.246 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.967 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 75 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 65 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 44 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 32 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.625 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.636 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.388 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.679 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.097 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.6327345309 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.9520958084 39% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 13.6137724551 22% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 28.8173652695 17% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 55.5748502994 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 16.3942115768 43% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1016.0 2260.96107784 45% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 187.0 441.139720559 42% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43315508021 5.12650576532 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 4.56307096286 81% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04933405965 2.78398813304 110% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 204.123752495 49% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534759358289 0.468620217663 114% => OK
syllable_count: 340.2 705.55239521 48% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59920159681 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 19.7664670659 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 22.8473053892 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4642586453 57.8364921388 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.3636363636 119.503703932 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 23.324526521 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.63636363636 5.70786347227 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 8.20758483034 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.67664670659 128% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282003069048 0.218282227539 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0965985277277 0.0743258471296 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745773395752 0.0701772020484 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150851671293 0.128457276422 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433561558471 0.0628817314937 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.3799401198 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 48.3550499002 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.197005988 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.5979740519 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.32208582834 106% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 98.500998004 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 12.3882235529 73% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.1389221557 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.