Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the same time period, most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned with the station's coverage of weather and local news. In addition, several local businesses that used to run advertisements during our late-night news program have just cancelled their advertising contracts with us. Therefore, in order to attract more viewers to our news programs and to avoid losing any further advertising revenues, we should expand the coverage of weather and local news on all our news programs."
The arguments states that the television station is losing its customers and that they have received complaints from their customers complaining that they have devoted less time to weather and local news.
According to the argument it is assumed that the reduction of the time allocated for weather and local news is the main cause of the customers cancelling their contracts. However, more evidence is required to evaluate this argument. There is need for the Tv Station to check whether the numbers of viewers has increased or decreased after they changed their programme. If the number of viewers did not change this will weaken the argument and further investigation is stated in the argument that most of the complains that were received viewers were concerned with the weather and the local news. More evidence is required, we need to know how many people complained because most is general. You can say 3 out of 5 complaints and thus not big a number when it is compared to the number of viewers. This evidence will weaken the argument if the number of the complaints compared to the number of viewers was insignificant. However, if the number was bulk of the viewers this would strengthen the argument.
Furthermore, as the argument is analysed more evidence is need on the reasons why the local businesses were cancelling their contracts with the tv station. An interview could have been conducted to find out the real reason why these companies were cancelling the contracts and thus the conclusion wont be based on assumptions. If it was found out that the companies were pulling out their contracts because of the weather and the local news which is translating to less people viewing the channel then that will strengthen the argument. However, if the interview revealed that they were cancelling their contracts due to other reasons for example maybe the television station was having high service charges, that will definitely weaken the argument.
For the television station to say there are going back to the time they devoted to weather and local news, the company will need more evidence to make sure that there are not misguided on their conclusion.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-08-31 | tomlee0205 | 78 | view |
2023-08-27 | yirtusemla | 50 | view |
2023-08-19 | riyarmy | 58 | view |
2023-07-30 | aryaman | 58 | view |
2023-07-27 | searchinglife06 | 66 | view |
- Question authority. Only by questioning accepted wisdom can we advance our understanding of the world. 40
- The following appeared as part of a letter to the editor of a scientific journal."A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual's levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimulating situ 30
- The purpose of higher education is to prepare students for the future, but classen students are at a serious disadvantage in the competition for post-college employment due to the university's burdensome breadth requirements. classen's job placement rate 40
- If rituals did not exist, we would have to invent them. We need ceremonies and rituals to help define ourselves socially and culturally. 50
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.Write a response in which you discuss the e 40
argument 1 -- not OK
argument 2 -- not OK
argument 3 -- not OK
--------------------
flaws:
You are not on the right track for argument essays.
read some samples:
http://www.testbig.com/essays-list?keys=late-night&term_node_tid_depth=3
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: ? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 363 350
No. of Characters: 1783 1500
No. of Different Words: 151 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.365 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.912 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.56 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 124 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 107 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 69 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 46 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25.929 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.713 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.643 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.402 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.585 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.159 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5