A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting lethargy and other signs of illness After the recall the pet food company tested samples from the recalled food an

Essay topics:

A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting, lethargy, and other signs of illness. After the recall, the pet food company tested samples from the recalled food and determined that all chemicals found in the food were chemicals that are approved for use in pet food. Thus, the recalled food was not responsible for these symptoms, and the company should not devote further resources to the investigation.

A pet food company has received complaints that pets that consumed their food experienced vomiting, lethargy and other signs of illness. In response to these complaints the company recalled for 4million pounds worth of pet food and carried out their own investigation to see if their product showed traces of chemicals that could adversely effect the pets. They eventually came out with a conclusion that they had only used chemicals approved by food regulation authorities and therefore the afore-mentioned symptoms was not caused by their product. Let us investigate the assumptions involved in this argument to validate whether the company is liable or not.

Firstly, we need to do a broader market study. We need to sample if the products of other companies were adhering to the food regulations. If so, are there products also causing similar symptoms in pets. If this is the case, the authorities are at fault and further research needs to be conducted as to which chemicals were detrimental to the health of pets. And accordingly, new regulations need to be passed with higher safety standards. If the products of other companies are not causing any ill-effects on the pets, then the concerned company cannot conclude its investigation. Maybe there is an issue with the packaging of the product. Or food created with substandard ingredients had a lesser shelf life than promised by the company. It could be any of these reasons beyond merely testing the chemicals found in the food. And therefore, the company cannot conclude its investigations.

We need to understand the group of pets that faced these bouts of illness. Was there an underlying pattern that will help us understand the root of the problem. Were symptoms observed more in younger pets as opposed to older ones? Often pet food is different for different age categories. For example, companies provide special dry and wet food for kittens that are younger than one year. Similarly, we needs to understand if the pets had some pre-existing health complications. Because like age, there is specialised food available for pets with complications such as urinary tract infections, kidney problems, etc. So, here the company is making an assumption that there were no mistakes in the packaging of their products. As in, adult food wasn't packaged and sold as a adolescent product. And regular food wasn't sold as specialised urinary infection diet food.

For a massive food company with such a wide outreach, these assumptions have to be validated at scale. Logistic mistakes need to be investigated at various levels, from the food production factories, to distribution outlets, in addition to food testing for chemicals. Only after sufficient evidence is collected, can we arrive at a conclusion of indemnifying the company of all blame.

Votes
Average: 5.8 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-04-07 Aaishani De 58 view
2022-09-30 Mufaddal Rangwala 58 view
2022-07-21 gewkimrtnabovwtejo 23 view
2022-07-20 gewkimrtnabovwtejo 58 view
2022-06-22 Nalu00 83 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user akshaysshetty :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 341, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[7]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...races of chemicals that could adversely effect the pets. They eventually came out with...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 404, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'we' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'need'
Suggestion: need
...re younger than one year. Similarly, we needs to understand if the pets had some pre-...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 745, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...ng of their products. As in, adult food wasnt packaged and sold as a adolescent produ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 772, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
..., adult food wasnt packaged and sold as a adolescent product. And regular food wa...
^
Line 5, column 811, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
... a adolescent product. And regular food wasnt sold as specialised urinary infection d...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, firstly, if, may, similarly, so, then, therefore, as to, for example, in addition, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.6327345309 112% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.9520958084 85% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 11.1786427146 98% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 28.8173652695 108% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 55.5748502994 104% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 16.3942115768 61% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2358.0 2260.96107784 104% => OK
No of words: 456.0 441.139720559 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17105263158 5.12650576532 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62105577807 4.56307096286 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94036016726 2.78398813304 106% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 204.123752495 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506578947368 0.468620217663 108% => OK
syllable_count: 726.3 705.55239521 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.96107784431 141% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.67365269461 239% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 19.7664670659 137% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.8473053892 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.2087697868 57.8364921388 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.3333333333 119.503703932 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8888888889 23.324526521 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.48148148148 5.70786347227 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 6.88822355289 131% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.67664670659 278% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.443170868932 0.218282227539 203% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116357912341 0.0743258471296 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115481085896 0.0701772020484 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.272158616291 0.128457276422 212% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0977776901669 0.0628817314937 155% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.3799401198 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.3550499002 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.197005988 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.5979740519 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.32208582834 104% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 98.500998004 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 12.3882235529 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.1389221557 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 341, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[7]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...races of chemicals that could adversely effect the pets. They eventually came out with...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 404, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'we' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'need'
Suggestion: need
...re younger than one year. Similarly, we needs to understand if the pets had some pre-...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 745, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...ng of their products. As in, adult food wasnt packaged and sold as a adolescent produ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 772, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
..., adult food wasnt packaged and sold as a adolescent product. And regular food wa...
^
Line 5, column 811, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
... a adolescent product. And regular food wasnt sold as specialised urinary infection d...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, firstly, if, may, similarly, so, then, therefore, as to, for example, in addition, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.6327345309 112% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.9520958084 85% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 11.1786427146 98% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 28.8173652695 108% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 55.5748502994 104% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 16.3942115768 61% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2358.0 2260.96107784 104% => OK
No of words: 456.0 441.139720559 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17105263158 5.12650576532 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62105577807 4.56307096286 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94036016726 2.78398813304 106% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 204.123752495 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506578947368 0.468620217663 108% => OK
syllable_count: 726.3 705.55239521 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.96107784431 141% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.67365269461 239% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 19.7664670659 137% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.8473053892 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.2087697868 57.8364921388 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.3333333333 119.503703932 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8888888889 23.324526521 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.48148148148 5.70786347227 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 6.88822355289 131% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.67664670659 278% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.443170868932 0.218282227539 203% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116357912341 0.0743258471296 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115481085896 0.0701772020484 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.272158616291 0.128457276422 212% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0977776901669 0.0628817314937 155% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.3799401198 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.3550499002 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.197005988 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.5979740519 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.32208582834 104% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 98.500998004 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 12.3882235529 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.1389221557 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.