In the argument, the author concluded that the respondents in the first study by the researchers misrepresented their reading habits based on the fact that public library in the Waymarsh holds mystery novel more than that the literary classics, which respondents represented their habits in the first study. However, before evaluating the author’s conclusion, these three evidences is needed.
First of all, the author assumed that the people of Waymarsh read novels in the public library. There is no evidence of it: it is possible that many people of these city read novel in their house or other places. So, evidence, that the people read novel in public library, is required to evaluate this conclusion made by the author.
Secondly, more mystery book in the library doesn’t mean that the more reader actually read these books. It is possible that the availability of the literary classics in this city is less compare to mystery novel. So, evidence is required that the reader actually read this mystery novel compare to others.
Moreover, it is possible that the reader, who read mystery classics, read novel in the library more frequently than the reader, who read literary classics, though the number of literary classics reader is higher. And these is the reason that the public library holds more mystery classics.
In conclusion, the author’s summary in the argument exhibits notable flaws attributed to its lack of evidence and unwarranted assumptions. The author should provide the answers of the questions mentioned earlier with evidence, then it will be possible to evaluate the viability of the proposed conclusion in the argument.
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you t 50
- Claim Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s major field of study Reason Acquiring knowledge of various academic disciplines is the best way to become truly educated 54
- The following appeared in a memorandum written by the vice president of Health Naturally a small but expanding chain of stores selling health food and other health related products Our previous experience has been that our stores are most profitable in ar 55
- Claim Major policy decisions should always be left to politicians and other government experts Reason Politicians and other government experts are more informed and thus have better judgment and perspective than do members of the general public Write a re 50
- In a study of the reading habits of Waymarsh citizens conducted by the University of Waymarsh most respondents said that they preferred literary classics as reading material However a second study conducted by the same researchers found that the type o 60
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 40 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 3 2
No. of Sentences: 12 15
No. of Words: 267 350
No. of Characters: 1347 1500
No. of Different Words: 109 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.042 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.045 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.529 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 106 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 78 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 56 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 20 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.25 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.909 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.75 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.446 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.446 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.154 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.6327345309 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.9520958084 15% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 11.1786427146 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 13.6137724551 103% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 28.8173652695 94% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 55.5748502994 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 16.3942115768 43% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1394.0 2260.96107784 62% => OK
No of words: 266.0 441.139720559 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24060150376 5.12650576532 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.56307096286 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64080017065 2.78398813304 95% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 204.123752495 57% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.436090225564 0.468620217663 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 433.8 705.55239521 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 19.7664670659 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.0943315226 57.8364921388 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.166666667 119.503703932 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 23.324526521 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.70786347227 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162325072711 0.218282227539 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621283225199 0.0743258471296 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643302717456 0.0701772020484 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0955703338417 0.128457276422 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599481040896 0.0628817314937 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.3799401198 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.3550499002 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.5979740519 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.32208582834 97% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 98.500998004 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 12.3882235529 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.