The president, in the argument, recommends to use Zeta for their new buildings project. The recommendation drawn in the argument based on the fact that the building constructed by Zeta has lower maintenance cost and lower energy cost than Alpha. However, to evaluate the recommendation drawn in the argument these two questions should be answered.
First of all, is the less maintenance cost surely due to the construction of Zeta? It is possible that the building constructed by Zeta, now, uses lower quality material for its maintenance. Perhaps, the building constructed by Zeta had lower workload than the building constructed by Alpha. If one of the above examples hold water, then the recommendation drawn in the argument will fall apart. So, the above question should be answered to evaluate the recommendation.
Secondly, yes, the Zeta has a stable workforce, but, is this workforce more stable compared to that of Alpha? Perhaps, Alpha has a better workforce than that of Zeta. If the above example is indeed true, then the recommendation formulated in the argument will crumble. So, these questions must be answered to evaluate the merit of the recommendation.
In conclusion, the recommendation suggests in the argument exhibits notable flaws due to its dependency on various assumptions. The president will have to answer the questions provided in the essay and also give more evidence to evaluate the recommendation.
- Claim Major policy decisions should always be left to politicians and other government experts Reason Politicians and other government experts are more informed and thus have better judgment and perspective than do members of the general public Write a re 50
- Claim Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s major field of study Reason Acquiring knowledge of various academic disciplines is the best way to become truly educated 54
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you t 50
- The following appeared in a memorandum written by the vice president of Health Naturally a small but expanding chain of stores selling health food and other health related products Our previous experience has been that our stores are most profitable in ar 55
- In a study of the reading habits of Waymarsh citizens conducted by the University of Waymarsh most respondents said that they preferred literary classics as reading material However a second study conducted by the same researchers found that the type o 60
e-rater score report
flaws:
No. of Words: 228 350
Minimum 250 words wanted
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 228 350
No. of Characters: 1168 1500
No. of Different Words: 102 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.886 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.123 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.077 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 76 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 67 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 58 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 30 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.286 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 3.954 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.643 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.422 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.591 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.149 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.6327345309 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 11.1786427146 18% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 13.6137724551 29% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 28.8173652695 38% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 55.5748502994 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 20.0 16.3942115768 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1214.0 2260.96107784 54% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 228.0 441.139720559 52% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32456140351 5.12650576532 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 4.56307096286 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16486499264 2.78398813304 114% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 204.123752495 54% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486842105263 0.468620217663 104% => OK
syllable_count: 375.3 705.55239521 53% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 19.7664670659 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 22.8473053892 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.5922876578 57.8364921388 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.7142857143 119.503703932 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2857142857 23.324526521 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.70786347227 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0969861635894 0.218282227539 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0385438946108 0.0743258471296 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508972580364 0.0701772020484 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.05994181787 0.128457276422 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526504148382 0.0628817314937 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.3799401198 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.3550499002 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.197005988 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.5979740519 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.32208582834 98% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 98.500998004 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 12.3882235529 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.1389221557 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.9071856287 67% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.