The study conducted under observation-centered approach by Dr.field indicated that in Tertia nurture of the children is not only done by biological parents but by the whole village. To the contrary, Dr. Karp has scrutinized Terita using interview-centered approach and synopsized that children who are under interview do not much talk about other adults rather than it talks mainly about their biological parents. This argument is seriously flawed and does not provide essential information for deciding the study of Terita child-rearing. This argument is not providing enough evidence for evaluating the argument.
First Of all, For Examine there may be numerous approach available but he had used a particular observation-centered theme to gather his information. Means that this method may be the best method to observe and extract information at that time or maybe he is an expert who is using this efficient methodology. After observation, he had concluded that the rearing of children is done by the entire village. Possibility of change should be considered while evaluating this argument,maybe there is a significant change in the time span of 20 years. For instance,maybe they adopted western culture today which can alter the way in which children are answering.
people and Place of the interview will determine the quality of the information gained; no of children interviewed definitely affect the results and evaluation of the argument. Based on the interview of a small number of children one can not determine which approach is best. and the most important question of the interview also has ramifications on an outcome. One should also consider the number of question that is asked during the examination. For instance,10 children are interviewed and they are asking about how their parents encouraging them. In the reply, maybe children talk about their parents rather than adults. On such an obscure information one can not make decisions, One should coalesce some more evidence before reaching any conclusion.
Dr.Karp visited a number of islands and Terita is one of them. Argument cannot make any decisions before knowing that data is mostly from Terita. The author may have collected an ample amount of data from other villages using interview-approach than from Terita itself. There is also a possibility that nothing is collected from Terita and Source of the information presented may be other islands.
This argument is seriously lacking in evidence and hence should be scrutinized further. The adequate amount of information is not given. There are a plethora of reasons why argument should be discarded.No of questions, type of questions, change in culture are a certain exemplary why this should not be considered. and hence before making any important decision one should consider all the aspects of presented arguments.
- In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places. 50
- Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 50
- Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia. Using an observation-centered approach to studying Tertian culture, he concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than 69
Essay evaluation report
here goes the sample:
https://www.testbig.com/story/gre-argument-essay-topic-21-outline
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 22 15
No. of Words: 455 350
No. of Characters: 2361 1500
No. of Different Words: 211 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.619 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.189 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.972 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 181 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 133 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 103 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 64 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.682 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.946 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.545 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.3 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.52 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.138 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 480, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , maybe
...onsidered while evaluating this argument,maybe there is a significant change in the ti...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 559, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , maybe
... the time span of 20 years. For instance,maybe they adopted western culture today whic...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...ay in which children are answering. people and Place of the interview will determi...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 89, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... the quality of the information gained; no of children interviewed definitely affe...
^^
Line 5, column 204, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...the argument. Based on the interview of a small number of children one can not determine which ap...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 277, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...n not determine which approach is best. and the most important question of the inte...
^^^
Line 7, column 4, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Karp
...e before reaching any conclusion. Dr.Karp visited a number of islands and Terita ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 203, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: No
...easons why argument should be discarded.No of questions, type of questions, change...
^^
Line 9, column 203, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: Now
...easons why argument should be discarded.No of questions, type of questions, change...
^^
Line 9, column 316, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...lary why this should not be considered. and hence before making any important decis...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, so, while, for instance, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.6327345309 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.9520958084 124% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 11.1786427146 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 13.6137724551 95% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 28.8173652695 97% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 55.5748502994 99% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 16.3942115768 165% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2414.0 2260.96107784 107% => OK
No of words: 450.0 441.139720559 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36444444444 5.12650576532 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.56307096286 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11317074681 2.78398813304 112% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 204.123752495 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466666666667 0.468620217663 100% => OK
syllable_count: 772.2 705.55239521 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 19.7664670659 121% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.1080683348 57.8364921388 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.583333333 119.503703932 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 23.324526521 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.95833333333 5.70786347227 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.25449101796 190% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.20758483034 134% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.67664670659 150% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211576541486 0.218282227539 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059079976709 0.0743258471296 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663951025299 0.0701772020484 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112788242106 0.128457276422 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657836377292 0.0628817314937 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.3799401198 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.3550499002 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.197005988 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.5979740519 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.32208582834 100% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 98.500998004 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 12.3882235529 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.