Claim: The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.Reason: Heroes and role models reveal a society's highest ideals.Write a response in wh

A character of any person is not only appearance and style but generosity and benevolence are also taken into account while assessing someone's character. Everyone wants to be a role model and preeminent heroes have great influence on people in this television era. Heroes are considered omnipotent God nowadays. And to some extent understanding of character can be done by examine role models or heroes because in this era they have a great impact on people-people blindly follow them. But it is unshakably agreeable that huge society and its diversified people's character cannot be understood by simply accessing the character of small number of people like role models and heroes.
Society is consist of many disparate people. This people make up the society and their character makes societies character. There are some preeminent and flamboyant person-heroes-who can influence society with their skills and character. Superficial roles played by heroes often deceit people into believing that they are actual real-life heroes. And hence people want to become one of them. So one can claim that understanding nature of this small people society's character can easily sketch. But there is different character people in society and some who do not follow them. For instance, Actor Salman Khan is a very renowned actor and he has a great personality, everyone wants to become him but there are some who audaciously do not like him but they are part of the society and hence, one cannot examine an only tiny number of people and determine the character of whole society.
Heroes are people who best in their respective field and may be possible that not an expert in all the area. They are almost original in their respective field. And on the basis of only one field, one cannot determine the whole character of even a person then it is completely true for that of society's character. Some athletes-which are considered as role models are fit and healthy. People appreciate them for being fit and healthy but when the whole character is considered they do not provide any means of other characteristics of character like kindliness and benevolence. It is totally biased judgment if it is based on only particular field role model for whole society.
Heroes and role model reveal the high value of society. And everyone cannot have that highest potential. They are quixotic for some people as their standards are very high. Because of their standards, people often want to follow them. People imagine themselves in place of them, very successful and at the pick. But not always everyone reaches that point despite following ardently them. Character assessment of them cannot reflect society's low standard of people and hence they should not consider it a valid examination.
From presented exemplars and arguments one can easily and unambiguously consent that it is a biased or incomplete examination of society's character if only heroes and role model is considered. Rather one has to consider disparate characters of society because people are not partisan for any particular role models. One should closely comprehend and understand diverse people and their character in order to understand society's characteristics.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 12, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'consisted'.
Suggestion: consisted
...ike role models and heroes. Society is consist of many disparate people. This people m...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 45, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...ty is consist of many disparate people. This people make up the society and their ch...
^^^^
Line 5, column 194, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...ly heroes and role model is considered. Rather one has to consider disparate character...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 446, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to understand societys characteristics.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, so, then, while, as to, for instance

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 37.0 14.8657303371 249% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2703.0 2235.4752809 121% => OK
No of words: 522.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17816091954 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77988695657 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8222578262 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.421455938697 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 891.0 704.065955056 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 59.201423642 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.2068965517 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.1724137931 5.21951772744 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311634585417 0.243740707755 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100524775619 0.0831039109588 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744368792809 0.0758088955206 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215129562388 0.150359130593 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0762302589677 0.0667264976115 114% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 100.480337079 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.