Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa

Essay topics:

Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archaeologists discovered such a "Palean" basket in Lithos, an ancient village across the Brim River from Palea. The Brim River is very deep and broad, and so the ancient Paleans could have crossed it only by boat, and no Palean boats have been found. Thus it follows that the so-called Palean baskets were not uniquely Palean

The author of this passage had drawn conclusion from a number of assumptions which can be proven invalid. He has made the assumption that palean baskets were not uniquely palean as they were found in a neighbouring village. Although this argument may be plausible but on closer analysis appears untenable.

The author in the second line of the passage says that the baskets were “ believed to be made by palean people” there are no concrete evidences that these baskets were only made by palean people, it could be Lithos people who were making them and then transporting them to the palean’s. The passage also states that the “baskets were found in the immediate vicinity of Palea ” maybe these baskets were made in small scale factories in vicinity of Palea and transported to all nearby village.

Secondly a basket of palean origin was found in the Lithos village and the archaeologist believe that it was Palean may be this lone basket had reached there by a flood or any other natural calamity. As later on in the passage the author describes the Brim river which divides these two village. It could be this brim river which carried this basket from Palea to Lithos during a flood

Thirdly the author states that the ancient palean’s had crossed the river brim by a boat but there was no Palean boat found. This could be because the Palean’s may have had some alternative route to reach the village of Lithos. There is also a possibility that the Paleans used wood to make boat and it would have disintegrated with time and therefore no remains were found. Also the river is deep and broad in the present scenario may be in the archaic times it was shallow and not too deep thus easier to pass through by means other than the boat.

In summary the author fails to make a compelling argument of the Palean basket not being uniquely palean . To make this conclusion he needs more evidence and information which will help support his claim.

Votes
Average: 5.1 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-09 M1randa 55 view
2023-08-06 yuktapradeep 55 view
2023-07-30 Vivi5428 66 view
2023-07-30 Vivi5428 68 view
2023-07-09 ZHOU0444 16 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the assumption that palean baskets were not uniquely palean as they were found i...
^^
Line 1, column 203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... uniquely palean as they were found in a neighbouring village. Although this argu...
^^
Line 5, column 377, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...apos;baskets were found in the immediate vicinity of Palea ' maybe these bas...
^^
Line 9, column 201, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... a flood or any other natural calamity. As later on in the passage the author desc...
^^
Line 13, column 387, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...me and therefore no remains were found. Also the river is deep and broad in the pres...
^^^^
Line 17, column 105, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... Palean basket not being uniquely palean . To make this conclusion he needs more e...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, third, thirdly, thus, in summary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.6327345309 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.9520958084 77% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 11.1786427146 98% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 13.6137724551 88% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 28.8173652695 97% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 55.5748502994 70% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 16.3942115768 30% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 2260.96107784 73% => OK
No of words: 343.0 441.139720559 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83090379009 5.12650576532 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.56307096286 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53834173138 2.78398813304 91% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 204.123752495 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466472303207 0.468620217663 100% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 705.55239521 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 19.7664670659 66% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.8473053892 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.750252349 57.8364921388 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.461538462 119.503703932 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3846153846 23.324526521 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.69230769231 5.70786347227 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217232776445 0.218282227539 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084328182505 0.0743258471296 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759225693424 0.0701772020484 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120390231207 0.128457276422 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0617174966839 0.0628817314937 98% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.3799401198 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.3550499002 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.197005988 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.5979740519 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.32208582834 97% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 98.500998004 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 12.3882235529 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.1389221557 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 341 350
No. of Characters: 1577 1500
No. of Different Words: 162 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.297 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.625 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.323 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 106 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 70 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 37 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 20 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 26.231 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 18.306 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.615 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.37 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.635 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.108 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5