22.Claim: The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.Reason: Heroes and role models reveal a society's highest ideals.Write a response in

Essay topics:

22. Claim: The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.
Reason: Heroes and role models reveal a society's highest ideals.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.

Understanding the character of a society is a conundrum as the character of a scoiety is defined by the character of it's constituent elements. These constituent elements are individuals that have their own set of charachterstics and behaviour. The author suggests that the best way to understand the character of a society is to study the heroes and role models of the society. However, I do not agree with the author's claim. There are a number of reasons due to which such a study will result in a flawed conclusion.

Firstly, the kind of people public chooses as their heroes and role models vary a lot depending on the age group of the public. Teenagers are more likely to state a pop-star or a movie actor like Justin Beiber or Rihanna as their role models however a person in his late 30s might state a political leader like Narendra Modi or Barak Obama as his role model. Given to such variations, it is difficult to estimate the character of society as a whole by examining characters of their heroes.

Secondly, people usually choose a person as their hero beacause he exhibit an exceptional talant or skill or because of his exceptional work in a particular field. His character as a whole hardly palys a role in this unless he commits an egregious act. For example, Einstein is admired worldwide for his intellect and intellegence. Sigmund Freud is known across the world for his invaluable contributions to the field of psycology. Although these people are highly venerated worldwide but studing the character of society by studying their character is bound to give faulty results.

Thirdly, this study focuses on kind of characteristics admired by the majority. There is still a section of society that will not be included in this study. This section could be as large as 45% of the society. Ignoring such a large section while conducting a study will produce results that only represent a section of the society and thus, will be incomplete.

In conclusion, studying the character of heroes and role models is one way of studying the character of the society but it is not the most efficient way. The results of this study are quite likely to be flawed and incomplete.

Votes
Average: 5.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-03-03 Zahid6400 66 view
2024-01-26 LauraTing 58 view
2023-09-25 Isolus 83 view
2023-08-16 wopona8219 66 view
2023-08-05 rickxiangx 83 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user aku94 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 68, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'exhibits'.
Suggestion: exhibits
...oose a person as their hero beacause he exhibit an exceptional talant or skill or becau...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, third, thirdly, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1818.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 377.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82228116711 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82313612626 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.472148541114 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.2410295773 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6842105263 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8421052632 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.68421052632 5.21951772744 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330281728018 0.243740707755 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103438391805 0.0831039109588 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123851384316 0.0758088955206 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196531945151 0.150359130593 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100802106078 0.0667264976115 151% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.