Advertising recommendation of a movie production industry
As social being that we human are, it becomes necessary to point that we share information alot with one another and the information we gather from one another during conversation and by chance are most times more handy than what we see from advertisement, so for movies, it is can be seen that friends would tend to share information of a movie that they have seen with one another. so one would basically get to know how interesting a movie is from a friend, colleague or someone close to by having mere conversation, so it can be said that it is more effective that viewers would tend to do more advertising for superscreen movies than the company asting money in advertising.
Talking about the amount of positive reviews does not really help the situation because people would only tend to talk about thing that interests them specially movies, so it may be the case that the viewers that actually reviewed this super screen were people that found it riveting while majority of those that never enjoyed it bothered less of giving a review. so it may be that the percentage of people generally that really loved and enjoyed it decreased which the result of the review failled to capture because of its insufficiencies and so, if this is the case, the issue of investing money in advertisement would not solve the problem but rather getting more opinion from more viewer so as to know whether to change the concept nature of the movies as againt channeling the resources towards the wrong direction.
The recommendation of allocationg more of its share to reaching the public is flawed because when that happens, they impolcation is that the resources required to make a rich and interesting movie would suffer and that would mean that even if they succeed in getting more viewers but have nothing good to offer them, they would still run the risk of loosing those viewers and at the end they have poor movie and less movies which is a lose-lose for the movie company, rather, they can channel the money into making more good movies for their cherished viewers who when they enjoy what they have seen would tend to draw more people to the super screen movie and this means that the best means of advertiding is through the viewers which you do not necessarily need to do by spending much money.
so the recommendation i fla
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-20 | awojinrin | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-13 | Nowshin Tabassum | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | Kshitij Kasabekar | 13 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | aryaman | 66 | view |
| 2022-09-14 | Ninajm181181 | 58 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 385, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...e that they have seen with one another. so one would basically get to know how int...
^^
Line 2, column 250, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...hat actually reviewed this super screen were people that found it riveting while maj...
^^^^
Line 2, column 364, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...ed it bothered less of giving a review. so it may be that the percentage of people...
^^
Line 2, column 693, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...r getting more opinion from more viewer so as to know whether to change the concept nat...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 706, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e opinion from more viewer so as to know whether to change the concept nature of ...
^^
Line 3, column 413, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun movies is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...and at the end they have poor movie and less movies which is a lose-lose for the mov...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...ily need to do by spending much money. so the recommendation i fla
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, if, may, really, so, still, while, as to, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 24.0 11.3162921348 212% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 51.0 33.0505617978 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1921.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 409.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69682151589 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55247121572 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479217603912 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 600.3 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 20.2370786517 30% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 68.0 23.0359550562 295% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 226.76401096 60.3974514979 375% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 320.166666667 118.986275619 269% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 68.1666666667 23.4991977007 290% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 11.6666666667 5.21951772744 224% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127172894572 0.243740707755 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799807337668 0.0831039109588 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053796048451 0.0758088955206 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0973696485935 0.150359130593 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411807055637 0.0667264976115 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 34.8 14.1392134831 246% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 10.92 48.8420337079 22% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 28.6 12.1743820225 235% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.16 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.38706741573 117% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 30.0 11.8971910112 252% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 29.2 11.2143820225 260% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 30.0 11.7820224719 255% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.