All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary
The statement is quite comprehensive as it suggests the companies to listen to the ideas of their employees rather than hiring outside consultancies for the better functioning. There could be several factors upon which one can conclude that this is beneficial for the company's growth. Though I agree with the statement, I would suggest that the statement is a bit too extreme as it states that the outside consultancies are unnecessary.
Firstly, let us understand when does a company require outside consultancy. Any company who has just begun its progress and are not equipped with reliable and experienced employees or if a company is going through a bad phase, it would be tempting to go for outside consultancies. This, however, may not be the wisest of the options as outside consultancies would sense the company's desperation and may utilize it to their benefit. This, in turn, would result in a disastrous phase for the company.
The key to building a strong bond between the employees and the managers or the CEO, it is vital to trust the employees and motivate them to work harder by increasing their pay. This way, the employees will become more loyal and share a great camaraderie with the senior managers. No outsider can suggest ways for a company to work efficiently better than its employees.
It all boils down to how the leader of the company deals with the downfall of the company and how he/she coalesces the employees into working for a better future. Employee's loyalty and diligence is a measure of the leader's capabilities. Sadly, most of the leaders in the current world consider themselves to be the boss who gives directions to the employees and treat them as lackey rather than leading from the front and be an exemplifier for his follower.
A shrewd Leader would sit down with the employees of the company and discuss a way out of the problem. Outside consultancy's goal is not to benefit the company but rather to make their living by providing the few suggestions to the companies which may or may not be pragmatic. Instead, loyal and sagacious employees would focus on the problems the company is facing with the highest priority and dedication.
In a nutshell, I would strongly support the statement as outside consultancies can do more harm than good, whereas, It's own employees have a better insight of the problem and can come up with a more pragmatic and efficient solution. Hence, a company should spend more time discussing with the employees.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | Arpit Sahni | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | shamitha | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | JENIRSHAH | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | caseya5 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Siddiqur Rahman | 50 | view |
- adhadfhdafhfhfhfdh 16
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 50
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary 66
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 54
- Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2065.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 421.0 442.535393258 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90498812352 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82088485205 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496437054632 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 622.8 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1261527687 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.722222222 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3888888889 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.16666666667 5.21951772744 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.422442545654 0.243740707755 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144516040005 0.0831039109588 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0852888080357 0.0758088955206 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234584498018 0.150359130593 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680947723345 0.0667264976115 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.