All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Consulting exists and continues to exist as an industry for a reason. Although a company could save money by directing it's questions regarding effeciency towards its employees, it is sometimes necessary to have an outsiders opinion to bring a fresh new perspective to the workplace. That being said, I believe it is necessary for consultants and employees to work collaboratively. Such a collaborative effort would ideally produce a plan that is innovative yet practical, supported and beneficial to the people who work there, as well as cost-effective in the long term.
As a consultant, this person has professionalized in a career that is focused on ways to improve companies' effeciencies. In other words, consultants have experience, whereas a companies' employees may not. By having consulted for various types of companies, a consultant knows what measures can be practically and realistically implemented within a company and to what degree of success such measures have. This type of experience and knowledge is invaluable. By investing in someone who has first-hand experience and success with improving a company's effeciency, this could potentially end up saving the company. Listening to and investing in programs and measures proposed by employees who may have little to no experience with company operations, although may save money on the front end, these untested measures may end up costing the company more money in the long term. Therefore, by investing the money on the front end in a consultant, who has the experience and knowledge base of how to improve company operations, you are provided much more of a guarantee that these measures will be successful.
Furthermore, consultants bring a fresh perspective as an outsider to companies. It is well known that it can be difficult to see things that you are so familiar with in a different light. Consultants can come into a company unbiased and see areas of improvement that may be overlooked by the very people working at that company.
For these reasons, consultants are arguably a worthwhile investment; however, they are only worthwhile insorfar as they collaborate with the employees working at the company for which they are hired. This is absolutely necessary to understand what frustrates and slows employees down on a day to day basis. Without this grassroots approach, consults run the risk of completely missing the mark in terms of creating more effective company operations.
I do not believe that were companies to spend more time listening to their own employees, outside consultants would suddenly become unneccesary. Consultants offer a higher level of experience and knowledge in terms of company operations. Additionally, they offer a new set of eyes with which to analyze and view a company. These attributes, I argue, make such consultants worthy of investment. However, whereas the company may be required to spend more time listening to its employees, it is necessary for the outside consultants to spend time listening to their clients employees. Without an understanding of the day to day operations, the grievences of the employees as well as what they enjoy from the company, the consultant runs the risk of implementing strategies that may not affect or may adversely affect the people who actually work there.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-15 | Aishwarya01 | 54 | view |
| 2023-09-30 | Isolus | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-23 | bacec | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-18 | Adesina Boluwatito | 83 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | Theophilus Ebuka Odoh | 50 | view |
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 60
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 83
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations we cannot permit i 68
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 215, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'outsiders'' or 'outsider's'?
Suggestion: outsiders'; outsider's
...s, it is sometimes necessary to have an outsiders opinion to bring a fresh new perspectiv...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 209, Rule ID: ABSOLUTELY_ESSENTIAL[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessary'.
Suggestion: necessary
...mpany for which they are hired. This is absolutely necessary to understand what frustrates and slows...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, regarding, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2793.0 2235.4752809 125% => OK
No of words: 530.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26981132075 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79809637944 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17701618288 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.439622641509 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 876.6 704.065955056 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 6.24550561798 256% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.615760471 60.3974514979 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.434782609 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0434782609 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78260869565 5.21951772744 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3913350845 0.243740707755 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123867520255 0.0831039109588 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103924258465 0.0758088955206 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224433271172 0.150359130593 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0895324253814 0.0667264976115 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 100.480337079 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.