All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
A strong team with continuous thrive to ameliorate and gain goals and objectives of the company leads to the sucess of the company. There are many challenges that any business have to overcome to fulfill its vision. Misunderstanding and Miscommunication among the employees and members of the company are the two major factor that hinders the exponent of any organization. This leads to the hiring of inter consultant to solve the many problem which are forming within the organization. I would argue that it is unnecessary to hire outside consultant for increasing efficiency.
Whenever an outer skilled party is appointed, the views from the outside perspective often helps to view and access a problem which was invisible. This helps in formation of effective measures inorder to solve the existing problem. Nowadays there is rise in companies who have been using this method and have been able to increase efficiency quickly.
Yet, This method doesnot provide a long term solution to many internal problems. Employees are important factor for the smooth operation of any business. They are well aware of the arduous things that hampered the efficiency of the organization. If higher ranks spend more time in listening to the employee they could be introduced to the hinders that are standing in the way. For example In Starbucks if there was a problem of longer wait for customers to grab their drinks, This could be of many reasons a barista didnot show at work, the expresso machine was broken, there was a short in supplies, an event took near the cafe the respective day due to which it had longer time. If a manager was to hire a consultant maybe they will suggest to buy newer machine. But is this the solution.
Similarly, There could be misunderstanding , bad relation among employee and this could result in poor efficiency. It would be effiecient to talk with them and find a soultion in both parties. Simply it cost a lot to hire additional professional when the fund can be used for something effective or used as an incentive to motivate the fellow team and build their bond.
In Conclusion , Companies should listen to their employee to find the core problems that is hindering the success and find measures to solve these.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-15 | Aishwarya01 | 54 | view |
| 2023-09-30 | Isolus | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-23 | bacec | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-18 | Adesina Boluwatito | 83 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | Theophilus Ebuka Odoh | 50 | view |
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study 50
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations we cannot permit i 69
- The council of Maple County concerned about the county s becoming overdeveloped is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county But the council is also concerned that such a restriction by limiting the 59
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 432, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun problem seems to be countable; consider using: 'many problems'.
Suggestion: many problems
...hiring of inter consultant to solve the many problem which are forming within the organizati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 258, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sting problem. Nowadays there is rise in companies who have been using this metho...
^^
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...red the efficiency of the organization. If higher ranks spend more time in listeni...
^^
Line 5, column 682, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ve day due to which it had longer time. If a manager was to hire a consultant mayb...
^^
Line 5, column 736, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggest buying'.
Suggestion: suggest buying
...as to hire a consultant maybe they will suggest to buy newer machine. But is this the solution...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 43, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...milarly, There could be misunderstanding , bad relation among employee and this co...
^^
Line 10, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...m and build their bond. In Conclusion , Companies should listen to their employ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, similarly, so, well, as to, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1876.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 378.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96296296296 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80945672531 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529100529101 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.1935219697 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7368421053 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8947368421 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57894736842 5.21951772744 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287374280215 0.243740707755 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762510247106 0.0831039109588 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666479596633 0.0758088955206 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139411357571 0.150359130593 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049119086498 0.0667264976115 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.